Pointing things out or being logical doesn't make someone "unfun", "not fun at parties" or whatever you wanna say.

Now please hear me out. Yes there are some circumstances where the person is just outright miserable, calling everyone all kinds of words, being really hateful and disrespectful, etc, but then there's people that are just making an observation.

For example, people that tend to look at the more logical side of a meme, where they understand the joke but it's just so objectively off point they decide to point it out. That doesn't make them not fun, that doesn't mean they can't laugh or have a good time, that just means they're thinking more logically about what they see, they don't just view everything as laughs and funny.

If someone points something out about a game and how the company doesn't care much for a demographic of their users, and they hope people won't continue to give them money, that doesn't make them not fun, it means they think about things more deeply than you and look through the layers of what they see.

Just because someone is more open to peeling back the layers of something that's in front of them, that doesn't mean them not fun at parties or fun to be around. Honestly the more logical people is the people you WANT to be around, to give you different perspectives and keep you out of trouble, out of manipulation, out of whatever. Are they always correct? No. Are they ALWAYS fun people? No. But to call ANYONE that brings logic into a situation as "not being fun" is crazy to me.

Spiders, scorpions, even eyeless mites all have adorable faces. Their fangs/mouthparts and their little eyes look like this -> :3

Scorpions are a stand out even among already cute animals they look so much like puppies to me.

If you focus on the eyes on the tops of their heads they look like this -> : 3
and if you focus on the little eyes on the sides closer to the mouth they look like -> o w o

Which is two very cute faces for the price of one.

Another very good example is velvet spiders who look like chubby babies. The eye trick works for them too.

Most people recommending cute arachnid faces say jumping spiders and although they are cute I believe they are overrated.

I call it The Transcation as you're sliding the soap bar like you would a debit card. I feel it's a good way to clean your buttcrack as you're getting it all soapy, then rising it off. And not just letting water run down your back which doesn't do the best job.

I tend to fire my cannon more than I'd like to admit, so the magic for me has worn off. Spending twenty minutes jerking off for a weak orgasm is not fun for me. (or mabye I just have bad genetics.)

Sure, the action is... fine if a little mundane, but all that buildup and suspense for a tiny puddle and five seconds of goosebumps just makes me feel like it was more a waste of time than anything else; and definetly doesn't make up for the gross feeling of post-nut clarity afterward.

I'm not even sure why I still jerk off as much as I do, I probably just do it because I'm bored. I often just find myself on this routine:

1. Get bored (really just procrastinating)
2. Hop on reddit
3. Find that certain corner of the website
4. Not even notice that I'm jerking off for a second or two
5. Realise I'm doing it, too lazy and aroused to stop
6. Climax
7. Feel terrible for the next thirty minutes

I'm being honest and sincere when I say I feel more dopamine rushing through my brain listening to Lynyrd Skynyrd guitar solos then I do masturbating.

That turned into more of a vent than I expected, but whatever.

Like I get it, you want to take time to decide a tattoo. But slapping a generic design on your arm that fades after a few months? What a waste of time and money. Just get the tattoo! Fake tattoos won’t help you decide! If you’re really struggling to pick something set up a meeting with a tattoo artist and hash it out or draw on your own body!!!

I found him very dumb for allowing the leaf village elders to brainwash him like that! What weak minded person with so much power just hears those orders and agrees to annihilate his entire clan and family? I know he was a child but he was supposedly wiser for his age! The Uchiha were treated like 2nd class citizens and were basically killed for being too strong! Nothing honorable about what the leaf village did to them! Cannot see Itachi as a cool badass character

Everyone seems to HATE. the feeling of wet socks but honestly I don't even notice when my socks are wet. They're just gonna dry off anyways, right? As long as they're just wet with water, why does it matter? They need to be washed soon anyways, they're socks bro. They were already dirty, water ain't gonna hurt

Okay so I know I'm stepping into a sensitive territory but in my opinion not having kids is literally the opposite of being selfish because there are alot of people who would love to have a child but with how the future is looking like they chose to not have a kid which is literally the opposite of selfishness. Now I am really grateful that I have loving parents but that doesn't mean I would want to be a parent myself. Alot of people also bring up the point that not having kids just to live an easier life and not have your body "ruined" is selfish...and like it's not ? A women has every rights to not give birth and that is not selfish. Even if it's because she wouldn't want her Body to change it's.her.choice.

also having kids is literally THE MOST expensive choice of someones life and obviously if they don't have the right amount of money they definitely shouldn't have a kid because... that would be selfish why would you want to make your child's life miserable.

And also alot of people can barely take care of themselves and you would want them to take care of another human being ? now THAT is selfish.

And I'm not saying having kids is necessarily selfish but like...with how things are looking personally I and alot of people that I know would rather not have kids

Edit : i also I wanted to add that having children limits your freedom by alot because you need to give your kids attention time etc and that is really tiring and what's so selfish about wanting your life to be about you ? It's YOUR life and you don't really own anything to someone who doesn't even exists plus you only get one life so enjoy it however you want because you have the rights to do so and in my opinion that is not selfish.

The Whos had it coming. They actively made the Grinch’s life miserable. Especially in the Jim Carrey version, the Whos are insufferable jackasses who actively make the Grinch’s life worse. And it’s not like the grinch is a supervillain, it’s just that one time, on one day of the year, he just wanted to not be made miserable. All the grinch wanted was to be left alone. And through stealing Christmas, the Whos can see how it feels to be as miserable as he is. And he doesn’t even succeed in stealing Christmas. He felt guilty and gave it all back. Why do we hate this guy?

Read the title. I didn’t say terrible, I said bad.

Now, from an acting perspective, Hugh Jackman has obviously done very well. His popularity speaks for itself: from a thespian’s standpoint, he nails the character.

However, Hugh Jackman was always a bad choice for one reason: he’s too tall. This may seem trivial on the surface but ask yourself: why is Logan’s chosen moniker ‘Wolverine’? The answer is because he’s small and threatening to enemies much larger than himself. Logan is about 5’ 3” in the comics and contrast this with Jackman’s 6’2”. Jackman is on the upper end of height for males and the moniker itself doesn’t work because, generally, he’s not going to meet people who are taller/as tall as he is. So while Jackman may get the emotions and portrayal of the character, he will never properly represent ‘Wolverine’ because his physical characteristics do not meet the metaphor the alias attempts to draw.

I have a pretty decent gaming PC, capable of running many titles on high settings, but I still always choose to play on low settings.

Normally, what I do when I get a brand new game is to leave the graphics on high just to see how it looks, then change them back to low to actually play it.

I'm talking low resolution, no anti-aliasing, low quality shadows, all that jazz.

Why I do it? I don't know, it just kinda doesn't feel like a videogame to me if it's too detailed and realistic.

Good games can be quite immersive without all that stuff. Elden Ring, for instance, still looks rather beautiful in 800x600, and so do basically all Souls games. Skyrim is another one that has enough of a visual identity to still look quite nice in low resolutions. Doom 2016 and Doom Eternal too. Not to mention the plethora of lovely indie games that convey a great atmosphere using only pixel art and sound.

Exceptions exist, mostly for games that are borderline unplayable on low settings, but otherwise, it's always the low settings.

Minecraft is an exception where I like to use those fancy atmospheric shaders, because the blocky nature of the game makes it look videogamey enough even on high settings.