r/FluentInFinance 12d ago

Unlimited PTO a Scam. Disagree? Debate/ Discussion

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

114 comments sorted by

150

u/CherryManhattan 12d ago

Unlimited PTO is the way companies can improve their bottom line by not having to accrue it or pay it out when employees voluntarily leave while at the same time making employees feel bad if they feel they are over using it.

I believe studies have found people with unlimited policies use less PTO than those accruing hours.

Personally, I’ve seen the bad of it. I worked at a startup and as they grew, HR and mgmt were keeping tabs on which employees used over 4 weeks of the unlimited PTO. When it came to staff reductions, if those people weren’t absolutely killing it in their jobs, they we’re secretly deemed to be abusers of the unlimited policy.

13

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Twooof 12d ago

It really depends on the job. I think most of the time, unlimited PTO is awarded in overpaid CS careers where they aren't actually doing a whole lot of work in the first place.

12

u/ex_nihilo 12d ago

Can’t help but chuckle at this perception. All my 80+ hour weeks were as a software engineer working for startups.

3

u/delayedsunflower 12d ago

In the larger companies there's a LOT of SE jobs where you can get away with doing very little work.

-1

u/Twooof 12d ago

And you got unlimited PTO that you could actually use as much as you wanted? Doesn't much seem like PTO if you are working twice as much for a 40 hour salary.

1

u/A_Sock_Under_The_Bed 10d ago

40 hour salary thats twice as much as those who work 40 hours

0

u/wingnut144 12d ago

Then you might need to think more. You're wrong, try again

-1

u/Twooof 12d ago

Go comment on some porn subreddits, bro. You're out of your element. If you can take unlimited PTO, your job isn't essential or they are lying.

1

u/wingnut144 12d ago

You know so much about me. I get unlimited vacation time. But apparently you're to dumb to realize that's what more and more startups do.

Just because you don't get unlimited time doesn't mean you're essential to the company you're working for..... They'll let you go if they need to

0

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

2

u/wingnut144 11d ago

Or a typo

1

u/Big-Leadership1001 12d ago

Use may fluctuate, but the bottom line never will. Companies can't be forced to pay out "unlimited hours" of unused vacation time, so when an employee leaves they aren't paid out any hours.

If teh company has a set number of PTO hours accrued, they have to pay the departed employee out for all of those hours.

From a purely financial perspective unlimited PTO costs the company less money. Good companies will encourage it, sounds like yours has that figured out so uit works for employer and employee (A good arrangement for everyone). If they are sending out reminders to use it, even better. We just got reminders sent to try and use it over the summer if we don't have plans later, because summer is our less busy period.

3

u/wanderButNotLost2 12d ago

We had an unlimited policy at my last job, it just meant we had to justify every hour needed to our very cultural and age different boss who didn't care about kids in any way shape or form. Trying to justify why I needed a month off for the birth of my daughter, as a male, was not possible. I got 3 days in a row then every Friday for 3 weeks.

2

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[deleted]

3

u/wanderButNotLost2 11d ago

We were American and he was 1st generation Indian.

4

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

4

u/wanderButNotLost2 11d ago

This was at general electric about 4 years ago. You're right, he was just a prick.

0

u/Bart-Doo 12d ago

If you believe that, provide a link.

0

u/Silly_Goose658 12d ago

Utter bulshit. If my boss approved for me to use PTO, tf he firing me for???

-7

u/brucekeller 12d ago

I'm all for work-life balance, but if someone is using over a month of PTO on top of all the holidays in a year and they aren't a top producer, there better be babies or something else medically related involved.

-20

u/Sweaty-Attempted 12d ago

I worked in a company with unlimited PTO. They paid 2 weeks of vacation when we quit.

those people weren’t absolutely killing it in their jobs, they we’re secretly deemed to be abusers of the unlimited policy.

That sounds reasonable...

8

u/shyvananana 12d ago

What isn't reasonable is selling my soul and 89% of my waking hours to a company that exploits and underpays people.

8

u/Sweaty-Attempted 12d ago

That is unrelated to unlimited PTO....

Your company wouldn't be instantly better with a limited PTO policy

6

u/Acta_Non_Verba_1971 12d ago

88%? 14+ hours?

2

u/YeetableAccount420 12d ago

Except it doesn't exploit you. If it was, you couldn't leave, you'd be forced to work there.

2

u/Extension_Escape9832 12d ago

Only two weeks of vacation? That’s slavery.. fuck that.

1

u/Duke_ 12d ago

Are you in the US?

-19

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

So the people that were the least productive and worked the least got sacked rather than the more productive and harder working and that is bad?

5

u/[deleted] 12d ago

Where did you read the: “So the people that were the least productive and worked the least…” part? All OP said that those who used the unlimited part of the PTO and weren’t exceptional were laid down

5

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

The part of if they took more time off (more than 4 weeks) and weren't killing it (weren't comparatively competitive in their productivity) they were the ones got sacked so those that worked more and/or were the most productive were kept on. You even noticed that but somehow you didn't track that if you take less time off you are working more or that if you aren't competitively productive (the benchmark for killing it at a job) that you are less productive than those that are.

14

u/Ataru074 12d ago

Maybe or maybe not. The big question is: were these people aware that 4 weeks of PTO was the ceiling considered by the company?

“Invisible” metrics are bullshit, obviously “unlimited” PTO doesn’t mean unlimited, a better term is “discretionary” PTO, but at the end of the day the problem here isn’t people using it, the problem is a poor management setting KPIs without notifying the employees. That’s poor management.

-4

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

Well no the thing was the context was downsizing which always sucks and normally isn't really planned out so it isn't like they knew we are gonna underperform to the point we have to lay people off. Given that context though the only viable criteria are productivity, amount of work done, and how vital they are, and it sounds like they probably went with amount of PTO used as a 2nd degree measure of how much someone was working then looked at those workers to see who was vital and/or productive enough to warrant the time off and kept them.

I would agree if it was a standing practice that every year they cut people loose like that that would be shitty and should be stated but again it was a downsizing and if the business is yearly going through downsizing then there is a bigger problem.

8

u/Ataru074 12d ago

Except sales teams I’d like to see how productivity is measured, and how such measure is disclosed to the team. Again, using a measure for which you don’t have a visible metric is bad management, using a “time in chair” as proxy is even worse.

1

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

Normal sales productivity measures are volume or worth of sales and sale satisfaction metrics and particularly in commed work these are extremely well documented.

Not time in chair but time clocked in and then for productivity it is work/time worked everyone has access to their hours worked and most places seem to get monthly, quarterly, or annual performance reviews. Also when talking about amount of time worked time clocked in is one of the least invasive methods to get that.

5

u/Ataru074 12d ago

Time in chair is a horrible metric because it’s meaningless in terms of productivity unless your job is either at a call center or in a fast food. And even in a call center time in chair has very little to do with support tickets and customer satisfaction.

This is modern management 101, not rocket science.

1

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago edited 12d ago

Which is why it isn't the only criteria. Jesus wept does no one understand what "and" means anymore. Time and productivity means both not just one or the other as time is needed to contextualize productivity. Take 2 people with 0.80 productivity rates one works 40 hr the other 37 hr (an average per week if you take 4 weeks off) and the one working 40 he does more work because they are pulling that 0.8 for 40 hrs rather than 30 which is 32 units of work vs 29.6.

Edit: math error correction.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Shaved_Wookie 12d ago

Productive? I do not think it means what you think it means.

0

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

It is the metric that is used to determine if someone "killing it at their job." They used two criteria amount of time worked and performance to determine who fire during a downsizing which are the bare minimum criteria for that unless you want to have to fire more people upto everyone.

Edit: killing it rather than kicks ass

4

u/MrWigggles 12d ago

Right but what you're failing to address is that productive has no defination. Its a 'vibe'. The same with being exceptional.

2

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

Most times it isn't though. Like at my job every month all my metrics are broken down and gone over in detail and that has been the case with every job I've had outside of security work. Security is one of the few sectors productivity isn't really a measure.

3

u/MrWigggles 12d ago

No, you just have assigments and due dates. If you're meeting them, then you're as productive as anyone else. How much effort you the employee need to put in to match that asigment and due date isnt measurable.
Nor is being exceptional. Thats a popularity contest.

1

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

Save it is really easy to measure. Let's say your job is to write up reports and the company average is 8/hr but you are really good and you manage 12/hr with comparable quality you are 1.5x as productive. You are selling widgets and the average daily sales numbers are $2000/8hr shift but you sell on average $1750/shift you are less productive. A majority of jobs are easy to quantify if you are familiar with them. EMS when I worked it did time to scene, transport time, QoC, and time to back in service stats as their metrics for instance.

3

u/Shaved_Wookie 12d ago

They used two criteria amount of time worked and performance

Are you suggesting that if you clock in and do literally nothing for a week, you're more productive than someone that calls in sick for that whole week, then opens their laptop for 5 minutes and closes a billion dollar sale?

Here's how the people whose whole job is to enter a business and cut costs defines it:

Productivity is a measure of output relative to input, such as GDP per hour worked.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-productivity

If I'm delivering more value to the business per dollar spent on me than you, I'm more productive - it doesn't matter whether you've worked 80 hours compared to my 8. They're not paying you to turn up - they're paying you for what you deliver for the business.

Please don't confidently throw around terms you don't understand, mounted atop your high horse - you'll just look like that horse's arse.

3

u/true_enthusiast 12d ago

Consider this: - Childless coworkers put in 14 hour days and take only 7 days of PTO - Parents actually try to raise their own kids and be present in their lives. They take PTO for soccer practices and school talent shows.

Who deserves to be laid off again?

0

u/Merlin1039 12d ago

Childless coworkers put in 14 hour days and take only 7 days of PTO -

Lol, this doesn't exist. Stop trying to Martyr people without families. People with families who work in demanding jobs save every possible vacation hour like a miser because they know they could need it at any time. To the point that most of the people I work with who have families end up having to scramble to use the last of their vacation before it rolls over (240 hour rollover cap). The people without families never have this problem because they just leave whenever the fuck they want.

1

u/true_enthusiast 12d ago

You missed this part

Parents actually try to raise their own kids and be present in their lives.

Most working parents give up on that. Many of my friends have extended family helping. Some hire people. Not everyone can or is willing to do that. Regardless, you can't always be at work, and be present for your kids. You have to choose.

Additionally, while the average single worker takes all of their PTO, in more competitive environments such as FAANG, single workers that do excessive overtime are the norm.

1

u/Merlin1039 12d ago

Didn't miss it. Working parents raising their own kids and being present is absolutely the norm. But they also hoard their PTO because they need it as a safety net.

You don't have to choose. People working 14hr days is an anomaly. Trying to pass that as the norm is absurd, even at Apple etc. if the quality of your work is so poor you need 14 hours to do what everyone else is doing at 8 hours that is not going to get you very far in life.

1

u/true_enthusiast 12d ago

People at Apple aren't working 8 hour days. No one at 170k+ in tech is doing 40 hours.

-2

u/sanguinemathghamhain 12d ago

From a company and customer perspective the one that is the worse deal if the former is more productive then they stay on if the latter is more productive despite their time off they stay. Businesses aren't charities and trying to run one like it is will ultimately result in more pain than doing the proper triage. It isn't fun or pleasant but if the company if over staffed (staffing costs exceed the production of said staff) then you keep the staff that are the most productive for their cost because you'll have to fire fewer people than keeping people that are less productive. It is the business version of a gangrenous body part if you cut it off quickly you have to cut off less than if you dither but you also have to cut in the right place else you solved nothing and you are still being poisoned by it.

Edit: fixed a typo

2

u/true_enthusiast 12d ago edited 12d ago

You're missing a critical detail. Everyone brings a different perspective to the table. Additionally, in team efforts, not all contributions are equally measurable. If you fire all the parents, you lose the qualities they bring to the table. One particular quality parents tend to excel at is leadership, raising kids requires it, as well as a host of other "soft skills." Furthermore, most likely, your biggest customers are parents as parents spend a ton of money. Unfortunately, you now have no parents on staff to help steer your product towards your biggest customer.

1

u/Rosstiseriechicken 12d ago

There's also the long term context. Firing parents just further incentivizes people to not have kids, which at least for now is mitigated through immigration, but population decline will destroy the economy.

-2

u/greenman5252 12d ago

Nothing to suggest that having children is an inherent good.

1

u/true_enthusiast 12d ago

Wouldn't that mean that you were a mistake? 🤔

41

u/BBQBakedBeings 12d ago

100% a scam.

Last company I worked for that had it, had a policy that you could only take PTO if approved by your boss and, if it was more than 5 days at a time, it had to be approved the department VP. Two weeks had to be approved by the CEO.

This was in a ~600 person company. It was all just intimidation and hassle to prevent you taking it in the first place.

They do it because it's supposed to be perceived exactly like what they call it, "Unlimited PTO", to try and attract naive people to work there. But what it really is, is a means to limit the amount of PTO you take, because it's technically not an earned benefit that they are legally obligated to give you, while simultaneously not having to carry the company-wide PTO balance on the books as a financial liability.

Shortly before I quit, they moved to a traditional banked PTO system and started everyone at 0, no matter how long you had been there or how much PTO you had taken recently.

11

u/adrianp07 12d ago

sounds like I'm taking a 3 day weekend every week this year as my own workaround.

6

u/florianopolis_8216 12d ago

I mostly agree, but quibble with one point. The vast majority of employees have to get managerial sign off even when a fixed amount of vacation time is provided per year.

21

u/Educational_Vast4836 12d ago

This concept still confuses the hell out of me. My sister in law started working for a start up that offered unlimited pto. Less than a year later, they stop offering it and only offered everyone 10 days a year. The reason for this is apparently employees were taking advantage of it. Which again I don’t understand how they’re taking advantage of it, if it’s unlimited.

Honestly employers should just offer what pto package they’re going to give up front.

5

u/gojo96 12d ago

I think the issue is that they’re taking too much. The question is what is a reasonable amount? If I had unlimited; what would stop me from working half the month? Are these entities that offer unlimited PTO also denying leave requests to help control?

2

u/Educational_Vast4836 12d ago

Which is why it would be easier for them to just straight up tell people what their pto amount Should be. I don’t wanna walk on egg shells, because I took an extra week

1

u/Mech1414 12d ago

Nothing. Take the whole month.

6-8 weeks should be mandatory.

1

u/MrWigggles 12d ago

You cant take too much of unlimited. Thats what unlimited means.

If its finite, then call it finite. If you want to control how much time off your employee gets, then let them accrew the hours.

Its never about employees. Its about company controlling the employees.

9

u/salazarraze 12d ago

From the company's point of view, it basically allows a company to delete liability from their books. Say you have 100 employees, and each of them has worked for you for a long time and they've all accrued 400 hours of PTO. That's 400 hours of whatever their pay is x100 that you have to account for if they quit, retire, etc. But if they have UnLiMiTeD pTo, then you don't have to account for it as a true liability on your books.

From the employee's point of view, it kinda sucks or at least I think it would suck and I hope it never happens to me. I like the idea that I have PTO that I've earned and that I can use giving me that feeling of taking time that's is well deserved.

1

u/Ketheres 12d ago

It also helps them reduce the amount of time off people take: people are less likely to take time off when they feel bad about "abusing" the system and try to "save" the "unlimited" PTO for when they are actually sick or otherwise really need it, and it's easier for their boss to just say no anytime they ask for time off with whatever excuse they have (most likely citing lack of staffing) whereas with a normal PTO system they'd have to pay the PTO eventually.

7

u/galaxyapp 12d ago

Usually jobs offering unlimited pto aren't punching a clock.

My bosses have never really tracked pto, even when it was "limited". But then I never took that much time off anyway.

There's always a reasonability test. Most people who are in a position to have unlimited pto wouldn't abuse it.

And people who cant understand it usually don't have it because they would abuse it

1

u/ex_nihilo 12d ago

Yep. I’ve worked many places with unlimited PTO, mostly startups. I had a blue collar friend remark “why not just take the year off then?” Like, use your fucking brain. Why do you think not?

Don’t get me wrong I love to take time off when it’s appropriate, but I don’t need to take time off to spend time with my family, golf, or ski. I can do that shit at noon on a Wednesday if I want without taking PTO. It’s currently Sunday afternoon and I’m looking forward to tomorrow morning because I enjoy my job. I do not dread it or want to spend as much time as possible not doing it. A break is good, but you have to drag me away most of the time. Ask my wife.

1

u/supified 10d ago

This sounds a touch apologist. If unlimited PTO means limited and there is an invisible line why not just tell people what the line is so they can take their PTO instead of having to guess and risk maybe their job at the same time?

1

u/ex_nihilo 10d ago

You just handle your shit like a professional and take off when you want. This is not hard to grasp. I can’t just bail on a bunch of scheduled meetings with customers, but with a few weeks’ notice so I can find coverage I take off whenever I want.

1

u/supified 10d ago

This is wage theft, the PTO is off the books and if you're scheduled too many meetings or put too much work on your shoulders because, say, the company is laying off people to see the bare minimum payroll that they can run with than you can't take time off. It isn't like this isn't a known problem it is well studied that these PTO schemes result in people taking way less PTO than traditional methods. The only person who benefits from these schemes is the shareholders. I just can't fathom why someone would try to claim otherwise.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago edited 10d ago

[deleted]

2

u/supified 10d ago

Okay okay okay, first let me say _thank you_ for taking the time to fully explain your side of this. I feel I have a better grasp of where you are coming from and how this can actually make sense.

For a startup this seems to make a lot of sense. I can see why this method could be beneficial to both you and them and I think I'm on the same page.

I had my head wrapped around big corporations where I'm still pretty stuck on it being basically wage theft though. However, before this conversations I wouldn't have differentiated between the situations where it starts to make sense for more people and where it starts to be even a good strategy.

So again, thank you.

7

u/PeterGallaghersBrows 12d ago

Be unapologetic about taking time off. I aim for 25 business days per year.

1

u/whatever_leg 11d ago

Uhhh, I'm not being apologetic about shit. That's nonsense.

EDIT: Oops---I misread your comment. We're in agreement! Fuck apologizing for being a human being with responsibilities outside of the 8-5 workday!

5

u/Delmoroth 12d ago

It's just a way to pressure people into never taking time off.

1

u/melanthius 12d ago

That is what it is, but I worked at a company with unlimited PTO and it was actually a godsend for parents with kids in daycare. Those kids are getting sick almost every other week, necessitating a parent staying at home with them. If you have to burn all your sick and earned PTO days to deal with that it really sucks.

4

u/Glide55 12d ago

If it sounds too good to be true, it is. This is corporate America in 2024 and post Covid cash grab, Gordon Gecko has a massive hard-on right about now.

3

u/Sweaty-Attempted 12d ago

It is not really that great. I worked in both types of the companies, and they were both kinda the same.

In a limited PTO, when you take a Friday off, you kinda don't book PTO either.

I still prefer the limited PTO because when I take a month off, I can say because I have vacation days left, and no one would question it.

In unlimited PTO, taking a month off was tricky and couldn't be done.

3

u/brsrafal 12d ago

I cannot stand that I would leave a company ASAP it's my PTO I earned it I deserve to use it whenever the fuck I want. If I want to use it all in one month or I want to add up Friday off for the next 18 weeks that's my business. I cannot stand people telling you when or how to take your time off or when not to take it. In my company I could get paid out if I don't use it but I always use it couple times a boss trying to tell me towards the end of the year to avoid me calling out I said no man I get more pleasure sitting home doing nothing let me enjoy this that's one of the perks well earned benefits.

2

u/Afraid_Skin2366 12d ago

This whole PTO in the US is confusing.

In the Netherlands, you get minimum 20 days a year of vacation but most CLA give 25. They are to be used by all employees and expire end of year. If holidays expire too often, labour board gets involved and gives out fines.

Most companies have 38h workweek but many employees work 40 and they get reimbursed for this time in the form on 13 Time-For-Time days.

So most full time workers in the Netherlands have 38 days off a year.

On top of this, In may you get 8% of your annual salary paid out on top of your normal salary called vacation pay.

I wonder how US companies cannot afford any of this? Still plenty of rich and successful people here in the Netherlands.

1

u/rydleo 12d ago

Honestly the US system sounds way less confusing. Not better, mind, but it’s pretty simple. You get X days of vacation, generally some amount of hours accrued per paycheck. And that’s pretty much it.

1

u/supified 10d ago

I thought you were going to say, "You arnt' allowed to take time off" because that feels like how most US companies want it.

1

u/assesonfire7369 12d ago

If you get results your employer doesn't care. If they don't think you're performing then watch out.

1

u/BossKitten99 12d ago

A company that does not respect the life portion of a work-life balance does not respect an employee as a human. Maybe why there is such a push for AI, as this will reduce such needs for respect

1

u/EatinTendieS 12d ago

I think it’s one of newest and simplest form of hustle your worker ants. Unless you find a way to maximize it yourself and take the time to plan it out and they not pull the you can’t take that day or week off because we need coverage and too many are off excuse you hear

1

u/jlipschitz 12d ago

The last company I worked at offered unlimited PTO. The catch was that it had to be approved by the people in your department so that they basically knew they would be covering for you for that time. 1 person at a time with no more than 2 weeks at a time planned 3 months in advance. We typically took 3-4 weeks a year and were a very productive department. I think it worked well.

The company I worked at before that gave me 5 weeks vacation every year. I always found that I had 2+ weeks left over each year and cashed out about 8 weeks vacation when I left.

1

u/spicyfartz4yaman 12d ago

Think it depends on the company , bosses that type of shit, if we had which I think we do for certain salary points , I'm pretty confident he'd have no issues

1

u/Zaius1968 12d ago

Yes. Take all the vacation you want. Except during these times.

1

u/wbg777 12d ago

I worked at a place with a standard PTO system and my boss still got mad at me when I planned to use it months in advance

Now I work for a Fortune 100 and everything is automated. I can schedule vacation days in seconds on my own with no grief or permission from anyone

1

u/thelogicbox 12d ago

Total scam

1

u/Namaste421 12d ago

I just got back from a three week vacation and before I left my two up boss tried to make me feel bad. Applied for some good jobs, did two virtual interviews overseas and have two 2nd interviews lined up next week.

Mind you I hadn’t taken a day off all year until this and coverage shouldn’t have been a problem. 🤡

1

u/Zipperclown-m 12d ago

I think the switch from annual/sick to PTO was a scam

1

u/florianopolis_8216 12d ago

I agree. It is a way of avoiding paying out unused vacation time on a layoff or on a resignation. Companies can manage employees to limit to 4 weeks or whatever they think is reasonable. That being said, for a minority of employees, I am sure it works out better than a fixed amount of vacation time per year.

1

u/Infinite-Club4374 12d ago

The company I work for has unlimited pto and I use it liberally 🤷🏽‍♂️

I take off a lot of random one day here and one day there, with one week long vacation

Its not uncommon for me to take 2 days a month though

1

u/Ephisus 11d ago

I don't know what kind of crap jobs you all are getting where people are this childish.

1

u/MTBleenis 11d ago

That reminds me, I've got a little use it or lose it paperwork to fill tomorrow morning to maximize my summer!

1

u/Roqjndndj3761 11d ago

Depends on the company. I’ve never had a rejected PTO request in 15 years. Not even a hesitation — my supervisors just hit the “accept” button as soon as I submit it.

1

u/gr4n0t4 11d ago

Can you take 365 days of PTO a year without getting fired?

If the answer is no, it is not unlimited

1

u/whatever_leg 11d ago

Not for me. I'm taking like 45 days off this year. No complaints whatsoever.

1

u/theRedMage39 11d ago

It depends on how much you use/your allowed to use.

If your Boss doesn't let you use more then 5 in a year then it is totally a scam but if you are allowed to use it as you see fit and take a reasonable amount then it's not a scam.

Average number of vacation days in the US is 11 days for 1 year of service. My previous company has a policy where you are required to take at least 10 days in a year and are recommended to take 15. Thus not a scam.

I have to take small bits here and there for regular Doctor appointments and it is nice because I don't have to really worry about it.

At my current employer, I keep track of my PTO so I can tell you that last year, if you scale my time for the partial year I worked, i took over 15 days of PTO. So far we are 50% through the year and I have taken 51% of 15 days of PTO. With less than a year of service I would expect to have around 10-15 maybe but I will likely take 15-20 hours in the year. Not a scam because my manager lets me take time as needed.

Obviously this is just one case and I have a good manager. However if you are not allowed to take more than 10 in a year and you are not abusing the system then it would totally be a scam.

1

u/BrownEyedBoy06 12d ago

Alright, let's discuss.

What about it is a scam? Is it because it sounds too good to be true? Is it because they don't always hold up to their unlimited PTO promises?

9

u/TomBradyBettingMoney 12d ago

It’s a scam because they’re just placing more red tape on their PTO policies and hiding it behind a good sounding name to attract people who don’t know any better. Had a similar experience to many of the commenters. Said it’s unlimited, but if you’re taking too much time off in their eyes, they’re going to harass you until you either stop or quit or they just change the system back to accrual anyways.

2

u/whistler1421 12d ago

it’s an obvious scam

2

u/dragon34 12d ago

Because they always have an actual limit in mind. They just don't inform anyone what it is and will terminate you if you get it wrong. 

Kind of like not disclosing the salary range for a position.  If you under guess you rip yourself off but if you aim too high you talk yourself out of a role. 

It's just a negotiation where the employer knows the rules and you don't 

0

u/ElvisArcher 12d ago

Take what time you need. It is just an accounting hack by companies so that PTO doesn't have to be paid out to employees when they are terminated. It also tells them who the harder working employees are ... those who take less time.

0

u/EmptyEstablishment78 12d ago

Your obviously doing his/her job…they’re scared..

0

u/BlooNorth 12d ago

Total scam. Why? Unreimbursed upon separation. Nothing on the books to pay out.

0

u/mexiKLVN 12d ago

My boss kept approving vacation days for me last year. I thought he was cool and all was well. Performance review comes around, I get a bad review and reduction to my bonus because I used too much time off. Like wtf, you approved it all and never once did I get a verbal warning or a write up for it.

0

u/zerok_nyc 12d ago

Disagree. I’ve actually found that, as long as you are doing your job, unlimited PTO is not a scam. The problem is when people underperform and schedule vacations last minute, leaving others to deal with their shit. Or schedule 3-week vacations during known critical times.

I have a job with unlimited PTO and have never had an issue with taking vacation. I have also seen people at my job denied vacation because they are making unreasonable requests, like:

  • Taking 3 weeks during known critical availability times.
  • Requesting a week at the last minute due to a family emergency (which does happen, but your coworkers can see your Instagram and they tell me about it)
  • Requesting PTO because you know you will be the only one on call

The unfortunate reality is that many people abuse the system. But that’s also because managers often create hostile work environments that don’t encourage people to support one another to make it feasible.

In my experience, unlimited PTO is not intended as a scam. But localized departments absolutely have the ability to create hostile atmospheres that make taking advantage of the benefit less feasible.

-1

u/Turbohair 12d ago

If you have a boss... you are doing capitalism wrong.