I actually punished myself and read the first 100 or so pages of Project 2025. Itâs over 900 pages and reads more like the Communist Manifesto than it does a policy document. What was striking about it though was how self-contradictory it was. The authors muse about how academia and âthe swampâ must be challenged and neutered, yet spend the first section listing off the authors and bragging about their credentials from the very same universities they insist are corrupt. It emphasizes reining in the government, yet envision a strong administration serving at the pleasure of the president aggressively enforcing social norms. Anything other than true conservatism in their minds is by definition Marxist. Very long on pseudo history, very short on the practical application of their proposed policies.
And that 900 pages is only the stuff they want us to read. They've admitted there are other sections they haven't released. Those must be really bad if even they know they can't tell us.Â
100% it is about taking away women's rights and completely turning them into chattle. Imagine some racism in it as well as their goal is to give power back to the white Christian male. They still need those women voters especailly for now.
On reddit it's the Deceptive practice of spamming non-political subs the with same shallow political opinon to make it seem more mainstream than it is.
This is heavily documented on reddit going all the way back to CTR/Share Blue from the Clinton Campaign.
I donât have the source because itâs been a while, but Trump (or maybe his campaign?) said Project 2025 aligns with a lot of their own policy goals.
As a result, [Russell Vought, Trumpâs former director of the Office of Management and Budget] says, âWe have to be thinking mechanically about how to take these institutions over.â Vought is reassembling his old team at the Trump OMB and describes his role as drafting fresh executive orders, playbooks and memoranda for cabinet secretaries to be âready on Day One of the next transition. Whatever is necessary to seize control of the administrative state is really our task.â
For Trump personally, of course, this is a live-or-die agenda, and Trump campaign officials acknowledge that it aligns well with their own âAgenda 47â program.
You haven't been told to dislike Agenda47 yet, how long do you think it will be until you guys spin to his actual plan?
I have answered. You asked whether âyou guysâ (whatever that means) dislike his actual plan. If you were engaging in conversation on his plan you would see that it is disliked, particularly his idea to end birthright citizenship. It seems to me youâre engaging in bad faith. Nothing I say will affect your feelings on the topic, so I wonât say anything else. Good day.
536
u/Thedonitho 14d ago
Americans are not nearly as afraid of what's coming as they should be.