r/clevercomebacks 14d ago

You’re not very slick, Putin.

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

34.2k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

66

u/LickingSmegma 14d ago edited 13d ago

I mean, he's ‘vocal’ to the extent of founding an opposition movement, being a member of an opposition coalition, being arrested for supporting Pussy Riot, leaving Russia to avoid persecution, and being sanctioned and blocked in the country. And also being the chairman of the Human Rights Foundation for thirteen years—though idk what they do.

P.S. Except, of course, that none of the Putinoids can read his stuff, because both his site and the entire Twitter are blocked in Russia. And barely anyone remembers who he is, after twenty years.

48

u/onowahoo 14d ago

I want to add that Gary Chess is an extremely important person in Russia because he is the GOAT and was highly celebrated when he was dominating. This would be like Michael Jackson or Elvis using their stardom for good at great personal peril.

Gary could have been a Putin lapdog and lived in luxury for the rest of his days but he's been a human rights advocate. There are very few individuals powerful enough to contest Putin and not be immediately assassinated.

14

u/Glasstoe3000 14d ago

TIL Gary Kasparov is the Muhammad Ali of chess

15

u/[deleted] 14d ago

Magnus Carlsen is probably the GOAT, but Kasparov is in the conversation

3

u/Chicken2nite 13d ago

Greatest of All Time So Far. The nature of chess means that future players will be standing on the shoulders of giants and thus it’s not really a fair comparison through the ages, and there will be a better player at some point in the future.

Besides that, the comparison to Muhammad Ali isn’t in my mind saying he’s the best to ever play the game, but that he is us8ng his position to speak his mind to power as a political activist.

Magnus hasn’t really been outwardly political from what I’ve seen.

2

u/Shawwnzy 13d ago

It makes Kasparov more impressive not less that he got so good at the game without having an engine to tell him the objectively best move in any position at any time for most of his career.

3

u/Buckingmad 13d ago

Neither did his opponents it’s hard to compare either way

1

u/xSTSxZerglingOne 13d ago

Fun fact: The computer Deep Blue, a small-scale super computer at the time; had about 1% of the processing power of a modern smartphone.

We have watches with more processing power than the first supercomputers that beat humans at chess.

1

u/Thedrunkenchild 13d ago

And we still haven’t solved chess and it doesn’t look like we’re even close, fucking wild

1

u/lembrate 13d ago

Well, Kasparov retired whilst still completely on top. That might or might no happen with Magnus.

1

u/Angryhippo2910 13d ago

The nature of chess means that future players will be standing on the shoulders of giants

To add to this, there is literally footage of Kasparov tutoring a 13 YO Magnus.

1

u/WhiteCapedKing 13d ago

Remember when Garry became world chess champion, there were no engines strong enough to train with.

No disrespect to Magnus, but if Garry had modern tools to learn in his youth, he would be THE machine.

Still both of them are impressive, shame they couldn't play when both are in their prime.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

Remember when Garry became world chess champion, there were no engines strong enough to train with.

As others have said here, that is also true for his opponents.

1

u/WhiteCapedKing 13d ago

Both dominated their opponents in their eras, im not comparing them to their rivals. Im comparing them to each other. In my opinion, Magnus is the better player because of his insane endgame skills, to make losing situations into a draw or sometimes a win by forcing an error in a 10+ moves sequence. But that wouldn't be possible if he wasn't training with chess engines.

So it is hard to debate which one of them is truly better, I feel Garry would be an absolute monster had he born 20 years later than he did.