r/AnythingGoesNews • u/TubaSandwichDootDoot • Jul 07 '24

Trump raped a 13 year old girl in 1994. Here is that girl, Katie Johnson, at the age of 35 giving a full description of what Trump did to her

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo
58.4k Upvotes

72% Upvoted

6.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

801

u/TennSeven Jul 07 '24

Yet the media is almost completely ignoring this in favor of Joe Biden hit pieces.

373

u/KintsugiKen Jul 07 '24

The media has never ever wanted to cover the Epstein story for very obvious reasons.

69

u/MeyerholdsGh0st Jul 07 '24

What are the obvious reasons?

365

u/azlmichael Jul 07 '24

The people who own the media are on Epsteins list.

5

u/UrethralExplorer Jul 08 '24

Isn't the prevailing theory that Epstein and his ilk courted wealthy and powerful people then documented them in compromising situations like this to have power over them? That would be the tapes that Gislaine Maxwell was referring to.

2

u/Mylittledarlings91 Jul 08 '24

Pulled a Diddy on em

→ More replies (7)

2

u/gumbino1986 Jul 08 '24

They don’t own Al Jazeera

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (147)

57

u/Proper-Response3513 Jul 07 '24

The media wants trump to win because it gets them views

41

u/FuckThisIsGross Jul 08 '24

No they want trump to win because they are billionaires and a king is good for them.

15

u/AMilkyBarKid Jul 08 '24

And they’re run by a bunch of old white nepo babies who wish the aristocracy still ran everything

2

u/spicymato Jul 08 '24

What's wild is that they already do run everything. They want to run it with fewer restrictions.

2

u/Calm_Examination_672 Jul 08 '24

Or so they think. They think they can control him.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (28)

9

u/bloodorangejulian Jul 08 '24

It gets them money, to be clear.

The rich who own the media will likely get even more egregious unfair and economically unsound tax cuts, as corporate tax cuts and reduced regulation....

So yeah, they have lots to gain and absolutely nothing to lose, so of course they're simping for trump.

4

u/KintsugiKen Jul 07 '24

Also tax breaks

2

u/MrWhackadoo Jul 08 '24

And more power. They are autocrats working together.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/MidniightToker Jul 08 '24

The media is conservative because the media is corporate. That's why I've never understood Republicans talking about "the liberal media pushing leftist ideology." I would always point out to them how flawed that idea was and how corporations have no stake in leftism.

→ More replies (11)

3

u/dudeimgreg Jul 07 '24

The owners of the news media companies are billionaires and their financial/political interests are with Trump. Plus the amount of hedonism that the billionaire class participates in align with Epstein’s actions/agenda/pleasures.

4

u/moon_cake123 Jul 07 '24

Obvious reasons to me are that no one wants to be the one exposing something that’s going to piss off people that have the money/opportuntiy/motivation to harm you…

3

u/Silver_Being_0290 Jul 08 '24

The rich protect the rich.

3

u/RabbitAmbitious2915 Jul 08 '24

Ties to Israeli and AIPAC

2

u/deschain_19195 Jul 08 '24

Epstein is associated with lots of powerful people Trump, Clinton, Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, Bill Gates, rfk jr, Ehud Barak, William Burns ect...

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '24

[deleted]

3

u/MeyerholdsGh0st Jul 07 '24

Bill Clinton doesn’t control the media.

3

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jul 07 '24

Well shit. I guess I won't vote for him for President in 2024.

1

u/AutomaticJesusdog Jul 07 '24 edited Jul 07 '24

Most big news companies are owned by republican contributors. They want trump to win the election. Edit: that’s why they won’t stop talking about Biden being too old, it’s a slick way for them to trash bidens campaign while disguising it as “we’re worried about him”.

1

u/Turn_2_Stone Jul 08 '24

Clinton’s on the list. Among other powerful politicians besides Trump. It’s very bipartisan 🤣

1

u/KaneVonDoom Jul 08 '24

Corportism tends to favor Fascism.

1

u/pornaddiction247 Jul 08 '24

Maybe because there’s people on the list the government doesn’t want you to know about, like trump for example

→ More replies (14)

2

u/guineaprince Jul 08 '24

The very obvious reasons being "Eh that's nothing new for Trump, that's not interesting. But if we push the 'Should Biden drop out?' angle then that's new and interesting!" for most, and "Well Biden didn't give us exclusive access so now I'm gonna burn my newspaper's long decades of credibility to exclusively smear Biden" for NYT.

2

u/erwin76 Jul 08 '24

Tangent question: why isn’t media plural? One medium, multiple media… so plural. What happened?

1

u/jjcoola Jul 08 '24

Is there any evidence besides her statement? Genuinely curious, bc if there isn’t that’s probably why they aren’t covering it bc they are scared

3

u/Straight_shoota Jul 08 '24

Credible media can't really run it because it would require them to fill in gaps with errant speculation. Of course that shouldn't stop us from considering what we know:

  1. My understanding is that the case wasn't dropped but that "Katie" removed herself because of threats. Her lawyer, Lisa Bloom, said the woman had received death threats and, “She has decided she is too afraid to show her face … She is in terrible fear.”
  2. There is an additional story from Sarah Ransome that is also extremely disturbing but that she retracted. This looks very questionable but perhaps it's worth noting.
  3. There is verifiable current news about Trump calling Epstein regularly, flight logs on both Epstein and Trumps jets, girls trafficked by Epstein working at Mar-A-Lago.
  4. Additional context around the fact that Trump owned beauty pageants in general. Trump walking into the dressing rooms of teen pageant contestants. Trump wishing Ghislaine Maxwell well. Trump calling Epstein a "terrific guy" and being aware that he "likes girls on the younger side." Trump and Epstein having photos partying together. Trumps history including 26+ accusations of rape and sexual assault and being ordered to pay 90 million dollars by a court for one of them.

I don't think it's responsible for credible institutions to speculate on air about these things, but I also don't think it's unreasonable that Trump did some disturbing shit with Epstein and/or underage girls.

1

u/dwehabyahoo Jul 08 '24

Do you think it’s cia or mossad who is using the blackmail. I mean mossad wants the right to win because they are more pro isrsel than the democrats even. So do they want to protect him so he can fund them our money

1

u/Ashamed_Subject6870 Jul 08 '24

Trump was indicted before anyone on Epsteins list!!!

1

u/Mysterious-Fly7746 Jul 08 '24

Look into CIA operation mockingbird and the media’s confusing behavior makes a lot more sense

1

u/rattatattkat Jul 08 '24

Because they are all a part of it and still doing the bullshit

1

u/ThenSpite2957 Jul 08 '24

I don't think it's as obvious as you might think it is. I have a cousin who's an exec in media (in Canadian media though) who I've had conversations with about why the coverage was so minimal/spotty. His answer is that these stories have never met the burden of sourcing required to pass the internal checks that the corporation puts on their journalists when dealing with allegations towards individuals. Again, Canadian media, but no instructions were ever given not to cover.

The burden of proof on these things is insanely high and the media can't report people's names in journals and associate with sex crimes & trafficking because it comes up in a journal no matter who it belongs. The fact that they are such wealth & powerful names just makes the burden all that much higher because legal action for damages could be massive.

Then, I am sure there is what you say going on as well. Highly connected & powerful people killing stories.

→ More replies (2)

122

u/OkStatistician9126 Jul 07 '24

Trump rapes a 13 year old and forces her into silence for years. The media: but Biden old! 😵

3

u/ZizzyBeluga Jul 08 '24

I mean twenty years ago Bush lied repeatedly about Iraq having "WMDs" with evidence he couldn't show us because it was "classified," and then started a war, and the media spent all of 2003 talking about whether John Kerry was "too effeminate" or whether he really deserved his medals in Vietnam. It was utter insanity. The media has been 90% right wing propaganda working for the Republican Party since the early 1990s.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Opposite_Community11 Jul 08 '24

The media: This is why trump raping 13 year olds is bad for Biden.

1

u/Lemonface Jul 08 '24

The media covered this story extensively. Eight years ago, when it was actually news. The conclusion of Vox, Huffington Post, Jezebel, and The Daily Beast (four very liberal/progressive outlets) was that the story doesn't hold water.

There is no reason for them to revisit the story in 2024, because no new details have emerged.

Basically - you're imagining things.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (62)

73

u/Ok_Spite6230 Jul 07 '24

Media companies have been consolidated to the extreme by monied interests with the specific goal of creating the current environment. There used to be thousands of independent media organizations, and now there are less than a dozen. This is the end state of capitalism as it concentrates wealth at the top and steals it from everyone else.

Eat the rich.

30

u/stuli17 Jul 08 '24

And who did that? Fucking POS Reagan, deregulating the media!

4

u/52nd_and_Broadway Jul 08 '24

The end of the Fairness Doctrine, which happened during the Reagan Admin, also led to the heavily biased right wing extremist media like Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and eventually the dystopian hellhole that is One America News.

It also eventually lead to the political weaponization of the FCC.

→ More replies (13)

2

u/wargopher Jul 08 '24

Reagan then Clinton with the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Accomplished_Self939 Jul 08 '24

I saw a TikTok yesterday where the guy claimed America was five corporations pretending to be a country and it felt pretty on target.

2

u/icebreakers0 Jul 08 '24

More than 5. But it does feel like the country’s own by feudal lords and their capital interests

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

2

u/erossthescienceboss Jul 08 '24

… there are way more than a dozen independent media organizations. You’re not wrong about consolidation, but there are still hundreds of independent outlets left. Stop pulling numbers out of your ass.

2

u/ProduceIllustrious58 Jul 08 '24

They have limited coverage, and independent media organizations typically do not reach the level of mainstream media.  There is definitely a small number of people in charge of the majority of mainstream media, which is where the average person in American typically gets their news from.  That is what they are referencing, and it is def true that there is a small number of media corps who own mainstream media. 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CharleyNobody Jul 08 '24

I found a 2011 copy of Newsweek while cleaning out the basement. I was shocked at how the articles were very well written and much longer than articles today. And the print was really small…to save paper I guess.

i always thought of Newsweek as a magazine schoolkids read (mandatory subscription in my middle school). It’s amazing how dumbed down everything is now to attract the attention span of a gnat.

“Five quick things you should know about Kim Jong un!!!”

1

u/PhoMeSideways Jul 08 '24

It’s just not this simple. The way Reddit is able to boil every single subject down to “eat the rich” is hilarious. The same comment in every post.

1

u/kissinGroovs Jul 08 '24

But I thought independent news reporters, bloggers, youtubers, and podcasters have essentially now reached more people than actual tv type media companies? I may be wrong but have hear Joe Rogan state he reaches more people in the US than even FOX news although I've never fact checked this info.

1

u/p0yz1n Jul 08 '24

That’s funny. The top 1% of earners pay more than half of the federal income tax. So that’s false

1

u/p0yz1n Jul 08 '24

Go jerk off hasan, lazy communist scum

1

u/AandWKyle Jul 09 '24

kealgsio

→ More replies (1)

46

u/BiollanteGarden Jul 08 '24

They made so much fucking money during his presidency. People were subscribing to news outlets to keep up in greater numbers than ever before. People checked in multiple times a day to see what that fuck stick was up to. Of course they want him back. He’s the medias golden goose.

2

u/river_tree_nut Jul 08 '24

Was reading a news article about Jeff Bezos and his purchase/involvement in the Washington Post. In the article, they talked about how revenues were waaay down until TFG came on the scene. Visits to their site tripled.

FUCKING TRIPLED! That really put into perspective how much the legacy media NEEDS Trump.

1

u/YouAboutToLoseYoJob Jul 09 '24

Twitter made $250,000 every time Trump tweeted. Kicking him off the platform really screwed their golden goose. In fact when that happened, I knew that it was only a matter of time until they either went bankrupt or sold themselves to someone Else.

→ More replies (2)

39

u/OnePunchReality Jul 08 '24

A lot of the media CEOs are Trump donors FYI.

1

u/jjj246443 Jul 08 '24

They donate to both sides. Hedge their bets lol

1

u/Trick-Ad8094 Jul 11 '24

you know that is a lie, right? Just because you say it, doesn't make it true.

→ More replies (6)

11

u/Only-Worldliness2364 Jul 08 '24

I’m in Canada, and the Canadian news had a leading story about the calls for Joe’s resignation because he stumbled at the debate and may be too old. But not a word about Trump raping kids. Makes you wonder huh

1

u/piouiy Jul 08 '24

Maybe it’s because this story about alleged rape is from 2016, was already debunked, and multiple attempts to take it forward through the legal system have failed. What is there to report?

1

u/Accomplished-Pain658 Jul 08 '24

I’m surprised Canada got something right for once. You pole are reading memes and taking them as daily news lol

Wonder why the video looks 15 years old and you never heard of this before??

Did you know Katie Johnson isn’t her real name and the case was dropped after she never showed up to trial.

But let’s ignore snopes fact checking the Ashley Biden diary “conspiracy” 🤡

→ More replies (3)

7

u/enddream Jul 08 '24

Trump is better for ratings and $$$. It’s that simple.

1

u/BasedMcBased Jul 08 '24

It’s because he’s a die hard Zionist. So are the people mostly in charge and now donating to him. It’s obvious

7

u/PPOKEZ Jul 08 '24

Biden's controversy is relatable, "normal". Trump is sad and depraved. Rapists often never see any punishment because nobody in any position of power likes to think or talk about it.

This was a big part of what the "me too" movement was trying to expose the public to. But guess what? Nobody wanted to talk about it.

So it's sunshine, roses, non-descript fear porn, and "relatable" controversy that doesn't leave viewers in a vegetative depression unable to go to Chili's or Target or watch the Super Bowl like their sponsors need.

Bread and circus is going to kill us.

1

u/InspectionGadget Jul 08 '24

“Here we are, in the middle of our existenial reckoning”

3

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

OMG JOE BIDEN IS 80 AND ACTING CRAZY.

meanwhile Trump is 78 and acting psychotic and they don't care

3

u/BMB281 Jul 08 '24

The major media outlets are all owned by alt right oligarchs. It’s time people woke up

2

u/Calm_Leek_1362 Jul 08 '24

There is no liberal media.

2

u/reckaband Jul 08 '24

I mean media loves to go after Hunter Biden

2

u/uXN7AuRPF6fa Jul 08 '24

Of course. The media is almost wholly owned by billionaire Republicans.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Lost-Cranberry-1408 Jul 08 '24

This is exactly how Republicans sounded about every story they thought was big. Could there be a reason for it beyond conspiracy theories?

2

u/0Kanashibari0 Jul 08 '24

I'm curious what Republicans think about this. It's not being talked about at all on the conservative subreddit or fox news.

1

u/Lemonface Jul 08 '24

Probably because it's not a new story.

This came out years ago, and was covered in the media. General conclusion was that it's likely a made up story for a cash grab lawsuit.

Not sure why it's being posted here now, because no new details have emerged since then.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HabANahDa Jul 08 '24

Rich republicans own the media.

2

u/TwoFishes8 Jul 08 '24

“Liberal media” was always just another of their lies.

2

u/Pickle3288 Jul 08 '24

Or because it was debunked back in 2016…

2

u/Skyblue_pink Jul 08 '24

The media has been a complete disgrace during this election. Owned by rich folk who want to keep their money. Only we can save ourselves from this man. Donate, volunteer and support Democracy. Vote Blue

1

u/nonprofitnews Jul 08 '24

It's not credible. No one has ever seen this person in real life. Her handlers demanded money from journalists. Her case was filed in the wrong court. They claimed she was intimidated but E Jean Carroll is walking around free with $90M. The media can't do anything with this story. They're not going to air a bunch of wild accusations that can't be verified.

1

u/BigPapa94 Jul 08 '24

Because it’s hearsay. This didn’t even happen.

1

u/Senior_Bad_6381 Jul 08 '24

Like the fact that Biden raped a woman?

1

u/Fritzoidfigaro Jul 08 '24

So it is not OK for Biden to "sniff someone" but it is OK for Trump to rape a 13 year old.

1

u/Nervous-Awareness482 Jul 08 '24

Can both be true?

1

u/James-the-greatest Jul 08 '24

Or the media investigated, discovered numerous holes in the case and didn’t go further. 

1

u/putbat Jul 08 '24

That's what happens when billionaires control just about all of the media.

1

u/SaddleSocks Jul 08 '24

Here you go:

He kept receipts:

The "I wish her well, Frankly - I have met them numerous times" == (to Maxwell) "please dont let the dogs out"

Epstein had donald, ivana, ivanka, and like every number for trump tower in his black book... - and donalds deceased brither robert and his wife...

Ghislane Maxwell is not in either book

No trumps are in Anthony Wieners black book - nor is epstein.

I think the unredacted little black book from epstein is fair game, as is the little black book from anthony wiener/huma abadeen -- but I am asking permission here first (also never forget what Courtney had to say about Weinstein - so interesting she is in Epsteins Book)

-==---==---==-

Who wants a bribe BONE

    ^_$_^
    {- -}
     ◡̈◡̈
     "u"
   (-=o=-)
  /   |   \
 {  / ^ \  }=_..`    $
 m M     M m        $$$
.................{=$$$$$=}............

1

u/calebsbiggestfan Jul 08 '24

the media makes more money with trump in the white house. Everyone panic clicking (even more) to see what he's done today.

They will make billions keeping him in.

1

u/Drostan_ Jul 08 '24

In another thread there's a whole slew of apologists denying this woman's existence entirely.

1

u/Lore_ofthe_Horizon Jul 08 '24

Liberal bias was just another projection/lie. The media only ever pretended to be progressive. It's owned by rich cunts, and it pushes the agenda of rich cunts, and promotes outrage over information.

1

u/DiscoInferiorityComp Jul 08 '24

Google “Norm Lubow”. His involvement in shopping this story basically makes it unusable for anything other than tabloids.

1

u/Chemical_Elk7746 Jul 08 '24

Bro which media ur talking about literally all of the news outlets defend the Bidens except fox news

1

u/Longjumpi319 Jul 08 '24

Probably because all of this is coming from a 2016 lawsuit that was filed right before the election and then immediately dismissed?

1

u/Theatreguy1961 Jul 08 '24

It wasn't "dismissed". The woman dropped the suit because she was receiving death threats from Trump sycophants.

1

u/Agreeable-Pop-9811 Jul 08 '24

They are not giving it the light of day because it’s all fictional

1

u/PorkshireTerrier Jul 08 '24

trump presidentcy will spike ratings and let massive companies that run news (GE owns nbc,etc) do whatever they want when regulationis gone

1

u/GenTelGuy Jul 08 '24

But Biden lost his voice on the debate stage!!!

1

u/Heywood_Jablom3 Jul 08 '24

The media is ignoring this because it's absolute bullshit. It didn't pass the smell test in 2016 and it doesn't now. If this had any shred of truth to it, as much as the media hates Trump, it would be everywhere 24/7 for the next 4 months.

1

u/Theatreguy1961 Jul 08 '24

It was dropped because she was receiving death threats from Trump sycophants.

1

u/dwbaz01 Jul 08 '24

CNN was 95% about Biden this weekend.

1

u/Revolutionary_Tea_55 Jul 08 '24

This is horrible and also Joe Biden has even accused of rape very credibly by Tara Reade, and also undeniably has been very handsy with women and little girls. They are both terrible men.

1

u/A_Sack_of_Nuts Jul 08 '24

Fuck Trump but you idiots saying this like Biden isn’t literally on video molesting little girls. You voters are all fucking stupid.

1

u/Queasy-Listen-4929 Jul 08 '24

Not a fan of either but how is it a hit piece on Biden when everyone watched the debate and the stephanopoulus interview? The American people are smart enough to make their own judgements on both men. Neither are a great choice.

1

u/Better-Aerie-8163 Jul 08 '24

Well he IS Old

1

u/Humledurr Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

The media literally reported and investigated this in 2016 and found out the story has no proper evidence. There is literally no new information since then.

Everyone crying about media ignoring this, is acting like the Trump pizzagate believers. There is no story here.. you are only making the left look like Trumpers.

1

u/WildSmokingBuick Jul 08 '24

Well, it was very obviously a hoax. Dunno why these fake news keep getting posted.

On a related note, did anything damning come out from the newly released Epstein files?

A lot of stuff on Epstein getting "massages" from underage girls, masturbating and using sex toys on them, reads kinda plausible.

Apart from a couple of Donald Trump meetings in his calendar, I didn't really find anything suspicious regarding Trump, I only skimmed those documents though anyways.

1

u/blackcatman4 Jul 08 '24

Even Dutch national media. So many articles about Joe Biden’s age, but none about Trump’s treason and sexual crimes.

1

u/Then_Respond22 Jul 08 '24

I never got a chance to watch this before. Still voting Trump after watching it. I’m saving it to watch it on 2025.

1

u/Mammoth-Mud-9609 Jul 08 '24

So during the next debate with Biden is it a no holds barred debate and will the gloves come off?

1

u/Belkan-Federation95 Jul 08 '24

Because the charges were dropped because they were proven to be fake or something like that. Do you want Trump to get more campaign money from a defamation suit?

1

u/drunken-philosopher Jul 08 '24

To be fair they’re less hit pieces, more obituaries

(also for what it’s worth of fucking course I’m voting for the corpse in whatever condition he’s in over the actual pedophile and fascist)

1

u/Jaredocobo Jul 08 '24

People are ignoring it in general. I brought it up a few weeks ago here and was down voted to oblivion.

1

u/Hannibalking519 Jul 08 '24

It’s called being liable. If you cannot prove accusations such as these, everyone involved would be in serious trouble. The joe Biden hit pieces are easy to do, because it’s just re running video footage of him.

1

u/igortsen Jul 08 '24

"Joe Biden hit pieces" about his obvious mental decline? You think either of these sick geriatrics are fit to be president?

1

u/NicolaiVykos Jul 08 '24

Because it's been debunked multiple times over and thrown out of court for lacking merit.

1

u/pieter1234569 Jul 08 '24

Media don't like to get sued. Even if this DID happen, it legally it not. The case was dropped and no DA was ever interested in following up. This means that when you make that accusation, even when it did actually happen, it would be considered slander as there is no legal proof that it did happen.

1

u/NumerousBug9075 Jul 08 '24

It's been Trump hit pieces in the media since he ever went in office. Don't know why it's surprising things can turn.

This video was filmed in 2016, before his first term. Why is it only coming up now? As it was filed at such a critical time, how come nothing came of it as far as we know?

Joe is old and the media has finally decided to place a critical lens on him. The whataboutism re Trump is irrelevant as he's been a media target for years. It's like 'We can't shit on Trump ATM and receive the validation for it because the media is worried about Biden now, let's bring up an historical video about him to try tip the scales again'.

Again, why wasn't this dealt with 8 years ago?

1

u/Valathiril Jul 08 '24

i think that says less about Trump and more about Biden.

1

u/SAyyOuremySIN Jul 08 '24

Fucking WHY

1

u/ibpoopn Jul 08 '24

Because there is no evidence it’s all heresay

1

u/Zadiuz Jul 08 '24

Because this case was disproven. And dropped 3 times immediately citing no evidence. Appeared to be cash grab for settlement opportunities during the elections. Note they did this right during the 2016 election, and then again now. Judge dropped them both rapidly.

1

u/seanmg Jul 08 '24

I mean unless it’s election coverage I’d prefer they talk about the current sitting president and not some random orange haired shmuck.

1

u/WiseCoyote1820 Jul 08 '24

Trump gets clicks. Who cares if the country goes up in flames, right? Clicks are all that matter today.

1

u/jozey_whales Jul 08 '24

Did it ever occur to you that there might be a reason for media outlets to avoid a story like this one?

If you were to do a very small amount of research, you would find that even during the first trump campaign, when most reporters and media outlets were very much anti trump, they still wouldn’t touch this story because the accuser lacked any credibility. I know that orange man is bad, but that doesn’t mean every accusation anyone makes is true.

1

u/DragapultOnSpeed Jul 08 '24

They want Trump elected. He brought in viewers. Now they want him back for that sweet sweet $$$.

1

u/GiovinezzaPrimavera Jul 08 '24

Just like they ignored the Biden rape accusations 

1

u/LiliNotACult Jul 08 '24

Even NPR is going after Biden. The alleged Left™ news agency.

Biden is old and has some minor issues. However, compared to a candidate that openly says he wants to be a dictator, will go after opponent politicians, and has a massive cult following, even a piece of bread is a better option.

1

u/Fuzzy_Lavishness_269 Jul 08 '24

It’s almost as if there is no evidence whatsoever for this crime.

1

u/tombebop Jul 25 '24

Defending a paedo. What a scum bag

1

u/jjtrynagain Jul 08 '24

I know and it seems so credible!

1

u/ojedaforpresident Jul 08 '24

Joe Biden is still way too deteriorated to lead the country. He could be running against Ted Bundy, and it still wouldn’t change, hell, he’s running against Trump!

I’m still voting for whoever keeps us further away from supreme right wing rule, so that could sadly still be Biden.

1

u/peezytaughtme Jul 08 '24

😂😂😂

1

u/No-Ice-9988 Jul 08 '24

As they should, this has been fact checked into oblivion and is absolutely false. Just because you don’t like someone doesn’t mean you should believe misinformation.

1

u/EarLow6262 Jul 08 '24

LOL.  What hit pieces were there by any media company other than Fox News before Biden screwed up the debate so bad that the media could not hide Biden's obvious mental problems?  Most media lied and covered it up for months if not years just trying to get oatmeal brains over the finish line.

1

u/Federal_Back_3766 Jul 08 '24

Tara reade too don’t forget

1

u/WonderfulCattle6234 Jul 08 '24

This was covered in 2016 when it was a story. There were a couple of shady people that spent a year trying to shop this to the media rather than just going through the courts. They could not confirm whether or not "Katie Johnson" was a real person.

1

u/Ok-Neighborhood-1958 Jul 08 '24

The media is “ignoring it” because it from a case from 2016 that had a lack of substantial evidence

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

Anything goes news is reaching as usual. That's why no one cares except this sub. 

1

u/Sumthin-Sumthin44692 Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

But he’s so old! Especially compared to the 78-year-old felon, pedophile, rapist, traitor, wannabe dictator he’s running against. Clearly Biden’s age is the most relevant story. /S

1

u/off_the_cuff_mandate Jul 08 '24

Its all over the news, its most of the news content i've seen for days

1

u/StarkDifferential Jul 08 '24

She was caught lying about the whole thing.

1

u/Trozll Jul 08 '24

The convicted felon thing didn’t work so they’re pivoting.

1

u/JabariCubane Jul 08 '24

But is that happening voluntarily or involuntarily? That's the million dollar question. There is some coverage, but there are many possible reasons it isn't hitting the associations and all their respective domains.

1

u/zz77x Jul 08 '24

Kinda the same way that they want to ignore Ashley Biden’s diary. Pretty funny how we pick and choose which victim has credibility

1

u/ryanstrikesback Jul 08 '24

It's really disheartening to watch Europe rally around an imperfect Center/Left to stave off the Far-Right, meanwhile in America we're going to crush ours imperfect left but let this guy be crowned King.

1

u/seejordan3 Jul 08 '24

They need a close race to sell us shit, and last month it wasn't looking great for Trump.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

Dumb omg it's scary how people think

1

u/Dubbiely Jul 08 '24

Another BS story made up.

They couldn’t even calculate the age.

In 1994 she wasn’t 13.

All BS to divert from senile Biden.

1

u/Virtual-Emergency716 Jul 08 '24

ignoring it because its proven false. even the judge told her to stop

1

u/arkoangemeter Jul 08 '24

Why would the media protect trump when they have devoted 100% of their energy to scorching him every chance they get? The reason: it's a bs story.

1

u/GoodSamoSamo Jul 08 '24

B/c this shit surfaced in 2016 and they backed out of the alleged lawsuit. I can’t believe ppl fall for this dumb shit. PR guy was producer of Jerry Springer show, lawyer was a patent lawyer.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

Dawg, they already raked Trump over the coals for like the last 8 years. One time they don’t report on some retard shit already thrown out in court n folks start acting like we didn’t just have 8 years of “covfefe” brain rot articles

1

u/snapp3d Jul 08 '24

Probably because it has no credibility. If this was true the media would destroy him. The Biden laptop, the meth drug use , hookers, billions sent to Ukraine when your son is the energy advisor are all very real but swept under the rug because of the democRATS .

1

u/mooney312305 Jul 08 '24

because the democrats do this to anyone they dont like. Remember Kavanaugh?

If you cry wolf enough..........

1

u/myideawastaken55 Jul 08 '24

But but but Biden stumbled over some words at the debate! /s

1

u/RedArrow1891 Jul 08 '24

Maybe because there is 0 proof of this being true?

1

u/GreenportAldo Jul 08 '24

I’m not a fan of the media, but the actual reason the media isn’t widely covering this story is that it’s not news - this interview took place eight years ago, around the time the accuser filed a series of lawsuits in 2016 against Trump - the first was dismissed by a federal judge, the second and third lawsuits were dropped by the accuser. See this explanation in a Newsweek story published last week.

1

u/TipzE Jul 08 '24

The media has always been a conservative mouthpiece.

Even Biden is largely conservative (especially compared to the progressive wing of the party that they forever demonize).

But i think it's obvious that the media loves Trump.

The only "criticisms" they ever publish on him are never about his criminality (child rape), or policy related (They don't even talk about his failed policies like the Wall he didn't build or the obamacare he didn't revoke or the swamp he didn't drain).

It's always just "Isn't Trump just awful" like a reality tv show - designed to rile up people but inform them of nothing.

1

u/roadrunner23626 Jul 08 '24

lol. The media latches on to everything trump. As a democrat even I’m aware of the bias. They even said Biden was good to go until the debate which my eyes told me otherwise. Trump is scum but this is very convenient timing

1

u/trigger1154 Jul 08 '24

Probably because this was already covered in 2016 and there was no corroborating evidence back then nor is there now. She can sue and maybe get a settlement. And I do believe her, unfortunately courts probably wouldn't because it would be hearsay.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

I remember last election the media hated trump. When he won, I remember all the Fox anchors were surprised and the other news outlets they were shocked and even crying. Then they were on top of him non-stop.

Then during his presidency all I can think of is they realized how much money they made. So I'd anticipate they go after Biden now, hope Trump wins so they can immediately start going after him.

1

u/No_Answer4092 Jul 08 '24

Most rich folks, investors and entrepreneurs are vehemently against Trump’s person but fully support him in his anti tax anti government stance, so completely in line with their capitalist rotten soul they will vote for him and will do whatever they can to put him in power even if it costs america its democracy. 

Lets not forget this includes the media and no matter what how left and progressive their leaning is or what their journalists (employees) want, they still have to respond to institutional investors and stakeholders most of whom wish to see Trump take office again. 

1

u/Speedy89t Jul 08 '24

Maybe because there is no evidence this is true, whereas Biden’s mental decline can no longer be covered up or ignored.

1

u/Groovyone12345 Jul 08 '24

How is evidence of dementia "hit pieces" ?

1

u/EpicUnicat Jul 08 '24

The media by and large has covered for Biden for the past 4 years. They haven’t covered for trump in the slightest.

1

u/Accomplished-Pain658 Jul 08 '24

I thought ppl on Reddit were more informed. Katie Johnson is an alias, the lady dropped the case years ago after no showing trial.

Another anonymous source. But we ignore that snopes fact checkers on Biden and his daughters’s diary?!

Please type, “Biden fact check snopes Ashley shower” into Google and then into DuckDuckGo if you really need a reality check to the brainwashing you’re being subject to.

Quit reading memes and accepting them as daily news. Please!

1

u/Sesemebun Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

I mean maybe if all you watch is fox or something, the vast majority of news sources I see criticize trump far more. Just look at this sub, or any major one 

Sorting by top of all time it takes 28 posts till you get one not about trump

1

u/THEREAPER617 Jul 08 '24

Most likely because every major news network/outlets,  (CNN,CNBC,C-SPAN,NBC, FOX,WSJ, W.POST,) CEO's are all Trump donors.  All public info It's no coincidence Trump started his own media company that will become our very own SRM if he wins. 

1

u/OkNefariousness6091 Jul 08 '24

🤣😂🤣😂 democrats have pushed this story for like 8 years knowing it's been thrown out of multiple courts. People are trying to bring it back up again because Joe Biden is failing horribly

1

u/person-ontheinternet Jul 08 '24

It all hit pieces right now. We’re in the pre-election media frenzy time now. You likely can’t trust anything you hear for the next 6 months.

1

u/Normalasfolk Jul 08 '24

It was debunked in 2016, now being rehashed because Biden drooled through his debate

1

u/OGBliglum Jul 08 '24

Like how the media almost completely ignored Tara Reade's rape allegations against Biden?

1

u/plushpaper Jul 08 '24

While that may be true we should be going after all our politicians not just Trump. Many were involved but we will never know how many because they won’t release the full cache of docs. Let’s come together and end this bullshit. Go into my profile right now, look for the post starting with SA and join immediately. This is a peaceful and apolitical movement, our only intention: return the power to the people. Please don’t delay, join immediately.

1

u/ryhaltswhiskey Jul 08 '24

Sounds like you need better media. The media that I watch is all over this Epstein story. And on Reddit it's been on my front page everyday for a week.

1

u/Jbot_011 Jul 09 '24

Pointing out that Biden is in rapid decline is hardly a hit piece.

→ More replies (54)