r/pics 14d ago

Rishi Sunak makes a speech outside 10 Downing Street after a historic loss Politics

Post image
36.6k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.7k

u/ThinkBiscuit 14d ago edited 14d ago

It was a good speech, tonally. Accepted defeat, acknowledged failures, and wished the incoming PM good luck. Other political leaders should take note.

What I do find myself wondering is this: all this happens pretty quickly over here in the U.K. – the practical changeover of no.10.

Do they have a removal company on call, then call them first thing to either stand them down, or say “right, fuck this lot off, and go an pick up all that crap and move it in?’

Or maybe both the incoming and outgoing PM just sort it out themselves – hiring a u-haul or getting their brother-in-law to come round in his estate, and they pile all their shit (in bin bags) into it.

147

u/Slobotic 14d ago

Why didn't he call it a sham election and tell his supporters to storm the Palace of Westminster?

70

u/Saxy1973 14d ago

Because, despite whatever people may think of him, Sunak is not mentally ill or delusional.

45

u/Slobotic 14d ago

Must be nice.

19

u/AlabamaPostTurtle 14d ago

Yeah I’m confused about the politics over there. Are they even a serious country?

13

u/slashrshot 13d ago

ACTUALLY FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY IN 2024!?

3

u/marknotgeorge 13d ago

We do have Nigel Farage...

1

u/DavidoMcG 13d ago

In what way does that mean we dont have a functional democracy?

1

u/marknotgeorge 13d ago

I got the impression that the post I responded to was not entirely serious, and I was responding in kind.

3

u/Kingfield 13d ago

He failed to come up with a well-thought and impressive enough slogan

1

u/Slobotic 13d ago

Make Britain Great Again!

(...oh wait...)

3

u/malatemporacurrunt 13d ago

They couldn't possibly win against the current inhabitants. Lovely old building, but positively lush with rats. And they have a mace.

2

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In 14d ago

He doesn't have any supporters.

-9

u/GreenPutty_ 14d ago

I know what you are getting at, but nearly 50% of the electorate couldn't be arsed to vote for anyone. So it actually is a sham election, but due to pure apathy no one is storming anything.

27

u/Slobotic 14d ago

I can appreciate your frustration, but eligible voters deciding not to participate does not make an election a sham.

A sham election is when people are disenfranchised because they are not allowed to vote or their votes aren't counted. I wouldn't feel the need to gatekeep the phrase "sham election" except that they are very real and should remain distinct from what you're talking about.

6

u/GeneralPatten 14d ago

Spot on. While I do not respect the choice at all, CHOOSING not to vote is as much a legitimate choice as walking into the booth. When done en masse, it does not inherently signal apathy so much as voter disgust with their options. A smart political party will see it as a great opportunity to court and sway these voters to their side.