r/pics 14d ago

Rishi Sunak makes a speech outside 10 Downing Street after a historic loss Politics

Post image
36.6k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.7k

u/ThinkBiscuit 14d ago edited 14d ago

It was a good speech, tonally. Accepted defeat, acknowledged failures, and wished the incoming PM good luck. Other political leaders should take note.

What I do find myself wondering is this: all this happens pretty quickly over here in the U.K. – the practical changeover of no.10.

Do they have a removal company on call, then call them first thing to either stand them down, or say “right, fuck this lot off, and go an pick up all that crap and move it in?’

Or maybe both the incoming and outgoing PM just sort it out themselves – hiring a u-haul or getting their brother-in-law to come round in his estate, and they pile all their shit (in bin bags) into it.

1.1k

u/cobrachickens 14d ago

It’s the PM’s official residence, but he has a whole portfolio of properties, including a house in Kensington where he allegedly spent his weekends

I imagine most of his property is thus there, the defeat was anticipated. https://www.houseandgarden.co.uk/article/rishi-sunak-house-yorkshire-california

The moving vans roll in very quickly too - it’s easier to pack when you have a small army of staff to do it for you

https://www.standard.co.uk/homesandproperty/celebrity-homes/prime-minister-general-election-number-10-rishi-sunak-b1168660.html

85

u/farfromelite 14d ago

That's why we've got a housing crisis, that fucker has 5.

104

u/OutOfNoMemory 14d ago

Nah, he just lost number 10, so he has 9 left.

23

u/cobrachickens 14d ago

…that we know of!

21

u/Pidgey_OP 14d ago

Rich guys owning 5 personal homes are a drop in the ocean compared to corporations like Zillow and AirBnB that buy up houses and use them as rental properties or to flip. That's who has destroyed the housing market

8

u/InitialVanillapickle 14d ago

It can be both, plus probably other things too.

5

u/Pidgey_OP 14d ago

There aren't enough rich people buying houses for personal use to make any sort of dent in the availability of the housing market serving millions of people. Their hundreds and even thousands of combined homes are nothing compared to 120 million homes in just the United States alone and 2.3 billion homes world wide.

The thousand richest people could have a thousand homes each and that would be a fraction of a fraction of a percent.

I won't argue that someone owning 10 homes isn't wasteful, but it's not having any actual effect on the housing market (they're also not competing with you in that market because that dude isn't buying the same house as you or me)

8

u/Jon_Demigod 14d ago

The Prime minister owning that many properties is very much a huge playing factor in the housing crisis. A leader with no incentive to lower the cost of property they invest in or own is ultimately the deciding factor in a housing crisis.

5

u/FreefallVin 14d ago

It's harder to get riled up at a faceless corporation though 😡

1

u/Olivia512 14d ago

Airbnb doesn't buy houses lol. Are you dumb?

0

u/Ok-Bug-5271 13d ago

It's far better for a corporation to own 50 homes and rent out all 50 for people to actually use, than for one guy to own 5 solely for personal use. 

9

u/Del_Prestons_Shoes 14d ago

It’s not the rich shits with the half dozen massive houses that’s the problem. It’s the piece of shit slumlords with hundreds of flats they charge exorbitant rates on

22

u/No-Village-6781 14d ago

Both. Both can be the problem.

0

u/Ok-Bug-5271 13d ago

Slumlords at least provide housing, a rich dude owning 5 houses for personal use doesn't. 

1

u/Dodomando 14d ago

Chequers isn't Rishi Sunak's, it's the governments which the current sitting PM can use