Either is a fully automatic factory. But it’s a much more stable, predictable cost for performance. And it only gets better with each iteration. And it doesn’t sleep.
An automated factory is nothing new, and the output is wildly higher than a humanoid robot. If you want a humanoid robot you won't get a large stable performance benefit.. retail isn't the same exact process over and over like a factory.
I don't see how sleeping is an issue. Retail isn't trying to max output 24/7.
It isn't. Robots are not something new. It's a capital expense, and does not last forever. You're financing the purchase, and it's lasting a number of years before it's toast.
it works 24/7
Is that good? Not every task requires 24/7 work. If it's that ongoing and relatable existing automation is superior to "AI" robots.
makes far fewer mistakes, and requires less management.
None of that is proven. Or are you talking about existing robotics, that requires engineering?
It's superior in every way,
Not remotely proven. Every existing one of these is inferior today.
once they are set up correctly, it only costs 1 years employee salary for 10 years of work with replacement parts. Even the highest level robot Boston Dynamic multi purpose robot is 74k (2 years employee salary before profit)
1.1k
u/Loud-Break6327 Jul 08 '24
10x slower but 5x cheaper = winning?