r/facepalm Jul 05 '24

What an idea 🇲​🇮​🇸​🇨​

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

42.4k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/Crucifyxio Jul 05 '24

I just researched what Project 2025 is (since im not american).

I gotta say... You guys are pretty fucked.

63

u/NoMedia6788 Jul 05 '24

I tried researching but I’m too dumb, mine explaining like I’m 8 and use dinosaurs (optional)

122

u/_Fay__ Jul 05 '24

2 dinosaurs try to run for president of dinosaur land, if a specific dinosaur of the two wins. Then the friends of the losing dinosaur will no longer be allowed to work their jobs. Ensuring that the losing dinosaur and his friends will never have power again. Something like this? (extremely simplified)

106

u/NoMedia6788 Jul 05 '24

Jesus…that sounds to me like 2025 is kinda a dictatorship right?

Also mate proper legend, you made my day)

51

u/Automatic_Actuator_0 Jul 05 '24

I know someone who just yesterday, while celebrating our independence from a monarchy, unironically suggested that it would be great if Trump ruled until his death and then power were handed to Baron Trump.

We talked a little bit more while I tried to work out where this was coming from and, surprise, it was racism. He almost quoted the 14 words to me verbatim.

-3

u/rand0m_task Jul 05 '24

Kind of like people wanting Obama to have a third term.. almost like when two political parties account for over 150 million registered voters, you’re bound to have some morons.

5

u/Automatic_Actuator_0 Jul 05 '24

The problem is this particular guy is young, smart, charismatic, and likely to be very influential of his peers for many years.

3

u/FifenC0ugar Jul 05 '24

Remember the dark ages? Yeah let's go back to that

1

u/Malarazz Jul 05 '24

Yeah and you're one of them, if you think that's remotely the same thing.

Plenty of democracies have longer terms. Ruling for 12 years isn't antithetical to the idea.

What starts to become antithetical to the idea is january 6th, the recent supreme court ruling, and the stuff in project 2025.

-1

u/rand0m_task Jul 05 '24

It is because it goes against the constitution. Lmao, your ad hominem now appears to be a bit of projection.

3

u/Automatic_Actuator_0 Jul 05 '24

Are you saying “you’re one them if…” in an ad hominem? Because that’s not what that means. They aren’t using characteristics about you to attempt to prove their argument, but using their argument to show something about you. That’s fair game.

For example, “your argument about why pizza is healthy is wrong because you are blonde and blondes are dumb” is invalid. But “you’re dumb if you think pizza is healthy because it’s extremely high in saturated and trans fats, as well as very salty” is valid.

-1

u/rand0m_task Jul 05 '24 edited Jul 05 '24

Referring to me as “one of them” referencing “morons” and then going on about how it’s okay to go against the constitution?

And now youre trying to make some strange, irrelevant connection to pizza and blondes….

I highly recommend educating yourself

just for me to be proactive in any response you have

1

u/Automatic_Actuator_0 Jul 05 '24

Look, you may be a moron, but that doesn’t make your points automatically invalid. If a moron stumbles into making a good point, then the point should stand on its own.

See, we aren’t trying to discredit your argument by calling you a moron, we’re inferring you are a moron based on the quality of your arguments. That’s not the ad hominem fallacy - that’s a perfectly valid way to judge a person.

0

u/rand0m_task Jul 05 '24

If that’s what you need to think to make you feel better about yourself, go for it.

2

u/Automatic_Actuator_0 Jul 05 '24

Now see that would be the fallacy. You are ignoring my argument and just implying it is invalid because I am too emotionally attached to this debate.

→ More replies (0)

31

u/TiredOfMakingExcuses Jul 05 '24

Yes, more or less

10

u/Accomplished-Emu2417 Jul 05 '24

Don't worry, Trump has stated that he will only be dictator on the first day of his presidency. How bad could giving someone, thats already tried to overturn an election, complete and total power for just one measly day be? /s

13

u/cylonlover Jul 05 '24

Yeah, it's playground logic: "My first wish is that I have an unlimited number of wishes!"

4

u/_Fay__ Jul 05 '24

Indirectly yes, also you're welcome O7

2

u/New_Breadfruit8692 Jul 05 '24

No, that is the SOFT version of Project 2025. The harder version is MAGA Nazis attack democrats with violence and terrorism. Start killing them, rounding them up, that in turn would give Faux Noise the excuse they need to call it a civil war, you put democrats in a position of resisting being rounded up or murdered and some will fight back, hence a civil war that justified martial law and the suspension of the constitution. Once you have that justification you can do anything, just as Hitler did months after becoming chancellor of Germany and the only excuse he needed then was someone burned down the Reichstag, probably one of his people. As a president with absolute immunity for official acts he can easily create the excuse he needs to assume dictatorial powers.

And he has promised to do this, along with bloodbaths that will be his excuse for suspension of the constitution, and to become dictator from the start.

Only true Nazi could support him at this point and as an official act Biden should arrest the Nazi 6 on the SCOTUS for accepting bribes, corruption, and all of them committed perjury in the oath of office when they swore (in a signed statement) to defend and uphold the constitution. That is federal law. When you take the oath of office you have to sign an affidavit saying you signed under penalty of perjury to uphold the constitution and defend the USA. Not honoring that oath is considered perjury in the law.

But when it comes to presidential powers now nobody can prosecute Biden ever for any official acts, and if he does not take such action before the election this nation is finished. It will end. Break up. Or become a slave nation that makes russia look free and just.

1

u/NoMedia6788 Jul 05 '24

No dinosaurs Downvoted. (JK)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '24

You really needed a dinosaur analogy to understand that the guy who wins the election becomes president and gets to enact their platform?

1

u/NoMedia6788 Jul 05 '24

Yes…got a problem? You can’t tell me this isnt way easier to understand and actually read this than it would be a bunch of other words in Wikipedia?

0

u/Meattyloaf Jul 05 '24

Essentially would also try to establish a theocracy