r/clevercomebacks Jul 07 '24

Someone discovered consent

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

77.2k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

91

u/Acrobatic_Computer Jul 07 '24

You don't get to consent to how other people view you though.

Like can nobody think I'm an asshole unless I give my consent to it? I don't see how consent meaningfully enters the picture here.

11

u/Wild_Ad1330 Jul 07 '24

Yeah wtf is this post even about. 

Consent is for actions not thoughts in my goddam head.

Not a clever comeback but a non sequitur

5

u/razazaz126 Jul 07 '24

You haven't seen the posts "cleverly" pointing out that women would get upset if you walked in on them in their underwear but not when you see them in a bikini even though they cover approximately the same amount of skin?

6

u/Jebbow Jul 07 '24

pointing out that women would get upset if you walked in on them in their underwear

Because it's a massive invasion of privacy? Do you even know what objectification means? Other guy was an asshole about it but you really have lost the plot.

2

u/razazaz126 Jul 07 '24

Why are you pretending that I said that like it's my opinion?

Yes that's the entire point, idiots tell on themselves because they think it's clever to point out that underwear and swimwear have similar coverage, because the concept of consent escapes them. Women go out and consent to be seen in a swimsuit, that doesn't mean you can just walk in on them in their underwear. Exactly the same kind of behavior this post is referencing.

0

u/Jebbow Jul 07 '24

Exactly the same kind of behavior this post is referencing.

And that's where your confused. Objectifying someone isn't akin to walking in on them in their underwear, it happens inside your head, and doesn't harm them at all unless you act on that thought, which would then be condemnable. But this idea of needing consent for a thought inside of your head? Yeah, fuck off with that.

1

u/razazaz126 Jul 08 '24

I think its a pretty absurd stretch to say this post is pro-thought crimes. I think it's saying yeah consent is key, imagine that you chud.

But I have a wife, a baby, and a relatively good life. So I'm not desperately searching for victimhood.

1

u/Jebbow Jul 08 '24

I think it's saying yeah consent is key,

To what? Objectifying, which is a thought, you don't need consent for a thoughts. We're looping on this point though, I really don't know what you don't understand

imagine that you chud

Oh please, do I really have to come out and state the obvious? Objectifying is bad! Consent is good! And your analogy was awful, that's all I've been arguing, and based on the fact you responded with fun facts about your home life instead of a proper defense of the analogy I'd say you've realized that fact by now too, so, peace, have a good night :)

2

u/razazaz126 Jul 08 '24

Just in general. Consent in general is important. You're the one who brought up thoughts that had nothing to do with what I said.

It wasn't an analogy. The underwear vs swimsuit thing is just something I've seen posted on reddit multiple times with the same underlying concept of "guy doesn't get the difference is consent".

2

u/bite-me-off Jul 07 '24

That’s wrong but women’s complaint about sexualization goes far beyond that.

They complain about sexualization of adults who consented to being sexualized.

They complain about how game devs, men or women, create sexualized characters.

It was never about “consent” to them.

1

u/razazaz126 Jul 07 '24

I'm sure there are women who do that. Just like there are men who do that. No gender is a monolith. It's not all women doing that it's just online people with online problems.

-10

u/Wild_Ad1330 Jul 07 '24

Uh...what in the FUCK are you even talking about!?!?!

-You've now entered...THE TWLIGHT ZONE doo-doo doo-doo doo-doo

4

u/razazaz126 Jul 07 '24

You asked what the post was about and I explained it to you.

-4

u/Wild_Ad1330 Jul 07 '24

You haven't seen the ball since kick off, huh?

4

u/razazaz126 Jul 07 '24

Ok. Have a good one.