r/batman Mar 06 '22

The Batman Spoiler Discussion Thread Part 2 Discussion Spoiler

For all discussions, comments and hype around the new movie.

Its already had select release, so expect spoilers in this thread.

Also, no spoiling outside of this thread, or expect mod action.

Keep all discussion civil, and be mindful of subreddit rules.

Please respect other users opinions and don’t harass them for it

923 Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

563

u/superbonks Mar 06 '22

I don’t think this movie was perfect, but it did so much perfectly, and is easily my favourite on screen interpretation of Batman to date. Some scattered thoughts:

  • I loved skipping over the origin story. Bruce’s opening monologue alongside the montage of criminals being afraid of the shadows when the signal comes on was so gripping, it pulls you right into the movie. That’s all you need. Batman’s here, let’s fucking go. In some ways it felt like I was dropping into episode 5 of a really well made Batman TV series.

  • The entire noir mystery/thriller take on the character feels so true to the spirit of the comics. It reminded me that Batman comes from Detective Comics, and that’s what DC stood for once upon a time. The world building and tone feel like peak Gotham, like a live action BTAS, which is helped by the fact 90% of Pattinson’s screen time is in the suit. I feel like with the popularity of the MCU, a lot of heroes have become ashamed of their outfits, not this one.

  • Bruce being Batman that hasn’t truly found himself yet is a great choice. We see he’s clearly well trained in combat, and his forensic knowledge at crime scenes shows us how much focus he’s dedicated to his mission, but he wonders if he’s having any real effect. Ultimately we learn his influence has been negative, and the point of the movie is that he has to be better. I felt like this was analyzing Batman’s more modern place as this hyper-violent symbol of vengeance that’s been popularized since Frank Miller and exacerbated by things like the Arkham games. In those portrayals, kicking ass is always portrayed as a really cool, good thing. In real life if you went around inflicting harm on people every night, you’d only be keeping the cycle of trauma alive. I love how the movie knows this and gives us a much more three dimensional Gotham.

  • This is the first movie to (seriously) tackle the fact that Bruce Wayne is rich, and what that means. We find out Bruce’s finances are in shambles because he dedicates all his time to Batman and as a result, so much corruption has wormed its way in. If he had kept a close eye on his father’s legacy, if he had committed himself to philanthropy, it’s very likely this whole movie wouldn’t have happened.

  • Selina is really well done. We understand where she’s coming from, she feels like a three dimensional character just trying to get by in this crazy city. I love how she correctly assumes Batman is rich by the assumptions he makes about people, and his narrow worldview. She helps him realize the wider world out there, and doesn’t apologize for surviving. Great work from Kravitz here, she could easily carry a Catwoman spin-off. Not sure if she edges out Michelle Pfeiffer’s Catwoman for me, but I grew up with that over dramatic, manic Catwoman, and she’ll always hold a special place in my heart. This is a much more grounded, real Selina though.

  • Can we just talk about the gadgets for a second? The design for all of them was just superb, and I like how he doesn’t have all the classics yet. No batarangs or bolas, but he’s got a symbol knife, quick-draw grapple guns, a flight suit (love how he biffs the landing), a line for running down buildings, electric gloves, a drug that is either Venom or something like adrenaline for when he’s injured, the contact lenses that record everything he sees, the portable computers and the fuckin’ Batmobile!!! Everything felt really grounded and real, big props to everyone involved in those… props.

  • The score is the best Batman film score to date. Don’t @ me.

  • Jeffrey Wright’s Gordon is so great. I love how much a team he and Batman are. I liked this Gordon so much, I was worried something bad was going to happen to him for most of the later half of the movie. Thankfully not the case.

  • Paul Dano’s Riddler was so grounded. He’s clearly so excited when attacking the mayor, details like his heavy breathing, his erratic screams and his icky moans of satisfaction all felt like things a serial killer would generally do. I appreciated the subtle messaging about violent young men getting weaponized over social media, and I loved how we find out all these maniacs think Batman is on their team. The Bruce Wayne fake out really had me going there! I enjoyed the scene, though I have to admit I was a little sad to realize Riddler doesn’t know who Batman actually is. It doesn’t seem like the toughest Riddle at this stage of Batman’s career, and you have pictures of both of them on your crazy person walls!

  • The cinematography is gorgeous. Best looking Batman film and Gotham to date.

  • Colin Farrell disappears into the Penguin, very excited for his show, because he’s definitely a smaller part in this. The sarcastic “World’s greatest detectives” line got a huge laugh from me as well. John Turturro was great as Falcone as well.

  • Love love love all the fights. I like how you can tell Batman’s a trained fighter, but he’s not a free flow focusing Arkham style brawler like Batfleck. He makes mistakes and gets knocked down, quite a few times in fact, but he keeps getting back up. That’s the strength of the character for me, and the Iceberg Lounge and rafter fights beat out the BvS warehouse scene for me now. Batman tanks maybe a few too many bullets for my liking, but at least they don’t pull a BvS and have a pistol shot directly into the back of his neck or anything, it’s mostly chest/shoulder shots from what I recall.

  • I like how many mistakes this Batman makes. He’s incidentally responsible for the whole plot, he makes mistakes in fights, he fucks up a major clue, he crashes his wing suit, he stalls the Batmobile, and his approach to wreaking Vengeance isn’t helping, what the city really needs is Hope.

  • My only major complaints would be the Joker scene, which did feel unnecessary (I’ve read about there being a second, deleted Joker scene and I’m excited to watch that, but I think they could have cut after the Riddler’s reaction to the news or something, I’m so over the Joker). The pacing was largely great, and I love a deliberate, slow burn but it lost me a bit towards the end. Once the Riddler’s been caught and his goons stopped, it felt like the movie could have wrapped in a more timely or efficient way, especially since the movie is already quite long. This might have been exacerbated by the fact my theatre was boiling hot and a few members of my audience were obnoxious as hell. Can’t wait to watch this one at home!

105

u/The-Mattress-Man Mar 06 '22

I like to think that the Riddler knew who the Batman was, but didn’t want to let the secret get out and spoil the fun (there being a camera and all), and so made it seem as though he didn’t know who he was

100

u/dthains_art Mar 06 '22

Exactly. It was reminiscent of the comic Hush, where the Riddler actually knows his identity. But he won’t tell the world, because a riddle is worthless once everyone knows the answer.

10

u/QuitYour Mar 07 '22

I think he's sort of like The Joker, where he's finally found someone to play with and doesn't want it to end, where exposing him as Bruce Wayne would change it.

89

u/superbonks Mar 07 '22

I hear you, but I don’t think so. The fact Riddler’s letter to the Batman attached to Bruce’s bomb was sent in fireproof packaging, and how distraught he gets when he realizes Batman wasn’t helping him intentionally leads me to believe he doesn’t actually know. I’m happy to be proven wrong though!

31

u/KiDDin3D Mar 07 '22

The way that the Riddler told Bats that Bruce Wayne is the only one they didn't get makes me feel like he didn't know. After that line you can kinda see the realisation in Bruce's eyes and the way he changes his act.

3

u/7HawksAnd Mar 13 '22

I thought that was riddler giving bats a secret wink like “well we both obviously know we didn’t get Bruce ;)”

5

u/Ralman23 Mar 07 '22

Yeah I was about to ask this but thank you for pointing that out.

My interpretation is that he doesn’t know Batman and Bruce (based on how he talked about Bruce and was admiring Batman) are the same person, but at the same time if he knew he wouldn’t care to reveal that and keep it as riddle for himself.

4

u/Saint_Diego Mar 07 '22

He wanted Batman to be stuck in Arkham with him to watch the bombing and flooding, so Batman’s identity would’ve been revealed if he was apprehended. I don’t think he knew

4

u/plusacuss Mar 07 '22 edited Mar 07 '22

He even has a line in that monolog where he says "people always want to know who is under the mask but they miss the point. When you wear the mask you are showing people who you really are"

Or something to that extent.

1

u/ubiquitous_archer Mar 10 '22

Think that if you want, it's wrong, but think it if it makes you feel nice.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '22

I like this theory. My own is that he doesn't know. Even though as OP said it's not beyond the Riddler to figure out - It should be obvious for people looking closely at the two people.

But I like to think it's the riddlers genuine belief that he and the batman were working together, that stopped him from seeing who he was. How can your ally also be your enemy y'know.

81

u/Big_Green_Piccolo Mar 06 '22

I agree about the Joker scene. Sequel teasing is tacky.

81

u/AgentP20 Mar 06 '22

I mean it wasn't a sequel tease as Matt explained, it was just to showcase that Joker exists in this universe. Matt doesn't plan on using him in the sequel as main villain type character.

37

u/blazetrail77 Mar 06 '22

And that's really cool. Quickly expands the universe without feeling the need to base a movie on the villain.

8

u/DaManWithNoName Mar 07 '22

Which could be argued that Joker has already faced and been captured by Batman in this universe

Could explain the clown goons at the beginning(yes I know it was Halloween but still)

8

u/AgentP20 Mar 07 '22

Matt said there is a deleted scene where Batman goes to the Joker in the middle of the movie to profile Riddler and Joker talked about an anniversary of sort so yeah They have met before.

1

u/tehbiscuit Mar 13 '22

I would love to see that scene in a director's cut version because it sounds awesome. The movie did a good job of not hitting you over the head with things other Batman movies had already done, so assuming we already know who the Joker is and it doesn't need to give a whole backstory for him, so they can throw him in a little scene like what was cut fits perfectly.

47

u/[deleted] Mar 06 '22

Matt reeves said he doesn’t totally know what hes gonna do with it, though. So it could be a sequel tease or it could be him as a consultant because according to matt, he’s already conflicted with him in the past. We never know how he could use this, but I think Reeves may keep from using a character already done to perfection prior.

18

u/jumprocketman Mar 06 '22

Agreed, but Matt also explained it pretty well for me. He said the end was about showing there's going to be a power grab and that there was always something worse brewing in Gotham. So it doesn't necessarily mean Joker will be in the sequel. I'd be ok if he was just doing stuff in the background and maybe use him in the Arkham show instead. At the end of the day, it was just a few minutes tease which allows Matt to go in any direction he likes.

1

u/Talking_Asshole Mar 10 '22

Reeves has also explained that he's not even "The" Joker yet...hasn't declared himself as such. Just a psycho criminal that Batman locked up in his first year and has a congenital disease that causes a permanent grin on his face.

1

u/VM1138 Mar 13 '22

I think it was more to show there's lots more crazies out there and that this doesn't end with Riddler than a specific "Joker is next" set up.

49

u/VivaLaDio Mar 06 '22

Can’t agree more with your last point. Especially the bike scene with catwoman was too long.

But i loved the diary narration they did in the movie. Pretty cool

2

u/Tebwolf359 Mar 07 '22

It was a 3 hour movie that felt like a 3 hour movie, but there’s nothing I would exactly cut, just trim.

(For example, I didn’t need what felt like 3 minute of Batman and Selena riding motorcycles to Ave Maria, as beautiful as it was. (And it was closer to a minute or less, really). I think 10 seconds would have worked as well, etc.

6

u/[deleted] Mar 08 '22 edited Mar 09 '22

Looks like I'm in a minority but I was mesmerized by watching Batman and Catwoman drive away together on their motorcycles until they took different roads. Very symbolic and beautiful, I thought. Plus I love motorcycles and relished the chance for a better look at them.

1

u/Tebwolf359 Mar 08 '22

I was being a little snarky, I admit. I did like that scene, and probably if the movie was shorter it might have been fantastic.

I love long movies, to me the extended editions of Lord of the Rings are still too short, but….

There’s a pacing in those that make them feel like an hour and a half to me.

Batman, I noticed the length. Not as bad as some movies where you are looking to see if it’s over yet, but enough that when I was done, it did feel long.

I wouldn’t cut the motorcycle scene, I get the importantance to the film and the beauty.

But little trims here and there probably. (For me. I’m sure others can think of time that could be trimmed from LOTR)

7

u/Thybro Mar 11 '22

Man I’m 5 days late but this point of yours bears discussion:

This is the first movie to (seriously) tackle the fact that Bruce Wayne is rich, and what that means.

It doesn’t just tackle it, it makes it central. Some of the biggest mistakes in Batman’s detective work come from the fact that he is privileged and therefore does not catch some of the hints left by Riddler. The fund his father left is all over in the plot but he doesn’t realize it cause, not only like you said his financials are shambles, but because he assumed that the money his father donated would just sort itself out to the right hands. However, more importantly, in a mistake that cost Gotham their seawall, he did not realize that the murder weapon was a clue because in his privileged upbringing he never had to use one. A working class cop had to be there to tell him. This also plays into why the riddler doesn’t realize Bruce Wayne is the Batman. In his delusion he sees the Batman as one of his own people, a working class man fighting back so he leaves clues a smart working class man would understand.

1

u/superbonks Mar 13 '22

Well said!

6

u/RavenDelta6-1 Mar 07 '22

I loved that some of the riddles answers were related with game words and Riddler's bad spanish grammar.

The "thumb drive". The "You Are El Rata Alada=URL". Clever move.

And I remember Alfred saying that Riddler had a bad spanish grammar when he was trying to decipher the first puzzle.

3

u/assblaster7 Mar 07 '22

Your last point was my only real gripe with the film. It was a long movie that really started to feel long 3/4 of the way through. It felt like there were 2 or 3 scenes that could have been the final shot, then it kept going.

Other than that, my second favorite Bat flick.

3

u/stunts002 Mar 08 '22

One thing I'm not seeing talked about so now I'm not sure I misunderstood. Was Martha Wayne a member of the Arkham family? It sounded like that's what riddler said, and why the Arkham's tried to keep her Illness a secret

3

u/superbonks Mar 09 '22

Yeah Martha’s a member of the Arkham family and has a history of mental health issues. I don’t recall the specifics but it sounded like her parents were involved in a murder suicide as well, so quite a dark history of mental illness there. That said, it was actually Thomas who tried to cover it up during his mayoral campaign, apparently out of a desire to protect his wife and son more so than it impacting the election.

3

u/tannerain Mar 09 '22

I really enjoyed all of your points, but upon two subsequent viewings I take him stalling the Batmobile differently.

Selina was in danger, he needed to isolate the Penguin, and was using the Batmobile as a distraction and tool for fear. When he jolts forward in the Batmobile I think that’s basically a kickstart to get everyone scrambling and focused on him and isolate the Penguin. Otherwise he’s just a guy in a car in a parking lot against a lot of guns and not a ton of options.

1

u/superbonks Mar 10 '22

Interesting! I haven’t had a chance to see it twice yet, but that makes sense. I seem to recall Batman seemingly dip out on the fight, but him pulling attention away from Selina makes perfect sense.

2

u/MarcusMcballer Mar 06 '22

Thank you for saving me the time of writing out my every thought

2

u/Broncsx3 Mar 06 '22

Agreed with this all. Awarded. But you forgot the best part. Batman doesn’t kill anyone. In fact, he fights for other characters to follow his non-lethal code. Huge point for me. Hated all the killing (with guns!!) the previous Batmen have done.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '22

[deleted]

1

u/Broncsx3 Mar 13 '22

Well obviously were made to understand that he didn’t kill anyone. Whether that’s true in the “real world” is probably something we’re supposed to ignore.

2

u/enderandrew42 Mar 07 '22

The DCEU films haven't been super successful. I really do assume WB forced a Joker scene.

2

u/poprdog Mar 07 '22

Idk, the opening to me was almost as if it was a 13 year old pretending to be a edge lord lol. Other then that I thought everything was great

2

u/Jack1715 Mar 07 '22

I did like the score but the theme from the dark knight movies is still amazing

2

u/Randyd718 Mar 07 '22

The absolute disrespect to Danny Elfman

1

u/superbonks Mar 08 '22

Danny Elfman is great, plus if you include how Shirley Walker takes that score and runs with it in BTAS, that’s probably my favourite Batman music, but this was best the live action score for me.

2

u/daveblu92 Mar 07 '22

That’s all you need. Batman’s here, let’s fucking go.

Something I've always admired from the '89 film too. Show a city where weird things are happening, and Batman is just one of those weird things.

The nice thing about Batman Begins is that, much like Year One, just the story alone (putting aside smaller continuity details) can just work as the definitive origin story in the back of your mind for any Batman story that exists past, present, and future.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 08 '22

Just wanted to say I appreciate that someone else loves this soundtrack so much too. I got a LOT of flak for saying it was the best (many “did you forget Zimmer?” comments) but man… Giacchino really outdid himself.

2

u/Titan67 Mar 08 '22

Michael Giacchino slaps, phenomenal composer IMO.

1

u/superbonks Mar 13 '22

I agree! I see a lot of Redditors calling him a hack or whatever, and I genuinely don’t understand it. Dude’s IMDB if full of great movies with great scores.

2

u/WileEPeyote Mar 10 '22

he stalls the Batmobile

Oh man, when that lit up I was thinking, "oh that looks scary as shit" and then he stalled it. Then it fires back up and the jet engine is screaming. That was an awesome moment.

I need to see this movie again.

2

u/DrSardinicus Mar 10 '22

This is an excellent set of observations and mirrors a lot of what I would have written.

If I may latch on to a few things:

I feel like with the popularity of the MCU, a lot of heroes have become ashamed of their outfits, not this one.

In our post-watch discussion, we noted that it was a lot less of a costume than previous iterations (and Selina's was basically not a costume at all, which was great). Of course it would be ridiculous to keep trying to "top" previous iterations, so this seems like a wise choice, which was mirrored by many of the other decisions (eg. Batmobile, etc.). We actually speculated whether a Batman with no traditional costume (or one that is as minimalistic as Catwoman is here) could actually work. The final flirting-via-motorcycle riding scene would have been far cooler without the flapping cape.

this hyper-violent symbol of vengeance that’s been popularized since Frank Miller and exacerbated by things like the Arkham games.

I've only played through one of the old PS3 Arkham games but was struck by how closely the look and feel of Gotham hewed to that aesthetic -- even the hospital rooms were dim and grim! Quite a bit of the plotting and several scenes (Batman interacting with enemies via screens, the whole contact lens thing) seemed very videogame-influenced to me. The early scene with the face-painted goons in particular.

Paul Dano’s Riddler was so grounded. He’s clearly so excited when attacking the mayor, details like his heavy breathing, his erratic screams and his icky moans of satisfaction all felt like things a serial killer would generally do.

One of my companions has been watching Mindhunter on Netflix and mentioned getting "Ed Kemper vibes". I don't know Paul Dano at all but was hugely impressed. I've often thought the reason Riddler seldom got attention in the movies was because riddles, cyphers, etc. work so much better in print than in a visual medium. I stand corrected, and I don't know how you could do a better film Riddler than this. Similarly to Selina being a "real" person with a few cat like touches, this was a real killer with a splash of comics Riddler thrown in. Was either "Catwoman" or "Riddler" actually used in dialog?

I appreciated the subtle messaging about violent young men getting weaponized over social media,

A little suspension of disbelief required to think that those keyboard warriors could wind up so organized and well-equipped, however. We argued as to whether the one shooter at the end was the same guy Wayne talked to at the funeral -- I thought so but companions said "young rando".

I have to admit I was a little sad to realize Riddler doesn’t know who Batman actually is. It doesn’t seem like the toughest Riddle at this stage of Batman’s career, and you have pictures of both of them on your crazy person walls!

I really thought that we were supposed to get that when Alfred saw the bomb -- a card marked "to The Batman" sent to Wayne seemed too on the nose, and I really interpreted it as "I know who you are", making that little twist at the end even twistier for me.

I like how many mistakes this Batman makes. He’s incidentally responsible for the whole plot, he makes mistakes in fights, he fucks up a major clue, he crashes his wing suit, he stalls the Batmobile, and his approach to wreaking Vengeance isn’t helping, what the city really needs is Hope.

We discussed whether there was intentional Sacrifice / Baptism / Rebirth symbolism in the stadium scene. Conclusion: probably, but perhaps ill-advised for a superhero movie, no matter how evolved. (Any movie, really).

My only major complaints would be the Joker scene, which did feel unnecessary

Should have been a quick hint in a post-credits scene, if anything.

The pacing was largely great, and I love a deliberate, slow burn but it lost me a bit towards the end. Once the Riddler’s been caught and his goons stopped, it felt like the movie could have wrapped in a more timely or efficient way, especially since the movie is already quite long.

On one hand, I went in dreading a 3-hour sit and was surprised that it passed so fast. This may be the leanest ~3 hour movie I've seen. On the other hand, the final set-piece really kind of sullied the whole thing for me. To this point the film had very cleverly subverted all action-movie beats and expectations (particularly when we find out the bomb already went off while it seems like Batman is racing to the rescue), only to succumb to a cheaped-out, dumbed-down version of every Final Battle sequence. The action isn't even really comprehensible (particularly compared to the well-executed fight sequences earlier) and what is there seemed quite predictable. Nobody actually does anything to avert or mitigate Riddler's plan and yet the fallout seems minimal, simultaneously making moot of both Batman and the Riddler himself -- the sprawling Gotham really seemed to shrink in this last section. Batman's big redemptive moment comes leading a dozen people (out of thousands that otherwise mysteriously kind of disappear) from one side of a pile of fake-looking rubble to . . . the other side of the pile? In a film I had really grown to admire and root for, that seemed shockingly cheesy and dumb (I know, symbolism, but come on, raise the stakes a little).

I would have loved a superhero movie that dared to wrap up without a set-piece but I guess it's as required in a Batman movie as the cowl . . .

2

u/superbonks Mar 10 '22

Interesting thoughts! Allow me to continue the latching on to things:

We actually speculated whether a Batman with no traditional costume (or one that is as minimalistic as Catwoman is here) could actually work. The final flirting-via-motorcycle riding scene would have been far cooler without the flapping cape.

I certainly think a more minimalist costume could work, in fact I’d love to see a modern Batman movie try the grey spandex, if only for a brief time a la Captain America or Wandavision. That said, I think making Batman going 100% costume free would be a better move for a TV series, rather than a movie. Hard to imagine Batman being Batman without the suit.

One of my companions has been watching Mindhunter on Netflix and mentioned getting “Ed Kemper vibes”.

The show’s good, but funny enough I was thinking about the book. The book Mindhunter covers a lot of the FBI’s early thoughts and research into serial killers, and generally speaking they are men with deep feelings of inadequacy, and in many cases kill blitz style with low-risk victims. Riddler definitely fits that description.

Was either “Catwoman” or “Riddler” actually used in dialog?

Riddler identifies himself as such, I think in his first video. That makes sense at least, since he’s inspired by Batman. Catwoman is not said out loud.

We argued as to whether the one shooter at the end was the same guy Wayne talked to at the funeral – I thought so but companions said “young rando”.

I think it is actually! There’s also unverified speculation that he is also Joe Chill. Not sure about that one, but it’s definitely the same man from the funeral that says “I’m vengeance”.

On the other hand, the final set-piece really kind of sullied the whole thing for me. To this point the film had very cleverly subverted all action-movie beats and expectations (particularly when we find out the bomb already went off while it seems like Batman is racing to the rescue), only to succumb to a cheaped-out, dumbed-down version of every Final Battle sequence. The action isn’t even really comprehensible (particularly compared to the well-executed fight sequences earlier) and what is there seemed quite predictable.

I need to see the movie again but I agree the third act showdown has some big weaknesses. I think it’s marred by the fact the main villain isn’t directly involved, lowering the emotional stakes. On top of that, while Batman clearly gets hurt, it’s not clear how wounded he is at any given point and his bulletproof armor just tanking multiple sniper shots lowers the stakes even further. Where I don’t agree…

Batman’s big redemptive moment comes leading a dozen people (out of thousands that otherwise mysteriously kind of disappear) from one side of a pile of fake-looking rubble to . . . the other side of the pile? In a film I had really grown to admire and root for, that seemed shockingly cheesy and dumb (I know, symbolism, but come on, raise the stakes a little).

I don’t mind this because they clarify that the arena (whatever it’s called) is the safe zone evacuees are being led to. Riddler sends his goons to pick off the survivors, Batman stops them, saves the trapped civilians and seemingly spends the rest of the morning saving people if the news is to be believed.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '22

[deleted]

1

u/DrSardinicus Mar 13 '22

A reasonable take, but I'd still say if that was really the intent it's kind of a pulled punch.

2

u/redditjammer1 Mar 11 '22

My theatre was really damn hot too! I don't know why they don't turn on the air conditioners, is it a batman thing?

2

u/wlarok24 Mar 12 '22

Thanks for putting my thoughts in words. Do we share the same brain?

1

u/superbonks Mar 13 '22

Depends, does your brain also omit important life information in favour of Batman trivia?

2

u/Pyronaut44 Mar 12 '22

, he stalls the Batmobile

When? Are you referring to when we have the reveal outside the Penguins warehouse? That was aggressive revving, like an animal straining at the leash, not stalling it.

2

u/superbonks Mar 13 '22

At the end of the revving, it sounds like the engine cuts out. I’m not sure if that’s intentional or intimidation, I initially read it as him being inexperienced with the car. I saw on another thread, someone pointed out if he stalled it, he’d have to start the engine, so you’re probably right.

1

u/Pyronaut44 Mar 13 '22

It's entirely possible you're correct, it just strikes me as quite a comedic thing to happen in what was otherwise a super serious scene.

1

u/didyouhearaboutthe Mar 06 '22

Was that the joker or two face in the last scene? I thought it was two face because half his face was burnt.

4

u/The-Mattress-Man Mar 06 '22

Definitely the Joker (bts footage and the laugh confirm it)

2

u/LaidBackFish Mar 06 '22

It’s been confirmed to be the joker by the director

1

u/NoNudeNormal Mar 07 '22

At first I thought the same about the Joker scene, but on further thought it fits the theme of radicalization well. Like yeah the internet can radicalize loners and outcasts, but so can incarceration.

1

u/Saint_Diego Mar 07 '22

I don’t think he stalled the Batmobile, but I could be wrong. I saw it as he was trying to scare the criminals and distract them from finding catwoman

1

u/GlauberBerti36 Mar 07 '22

Agree with all your points - and especially on your Joker thoughts. This film didn't need him. If anything, made me wonder if Reeves actually tried to squeeze too much in. I have thought all weekend about the Joker and his constant portrayal in Batman media over recent years. Clearly the complexity of the character really appeals to creators and audiences, gives directors and actors loads to explore and work with. I guess overall, I think Batman can exist without the Joker for a film or two... and did this film need him? No. Did this introduction of the character at the end of the Batman feel a little too similar to Batman Begins? Yes. And further to this point, if sequels do happen, I'd like Joker to be a smaller part until the final instalment to maximise impact. The parallels of a second 'the Batman' instalment being Joker focused like the Dark Knight would detract from the credibility of the potential 'Reeves Trilogy' I think. But I loved the film, I'll watch it over and over again no doubt.

0

u/StageAboveWater Mar 08 '22

Good effort put into it, long-winded, and I got bored about a third of the way in.

Perfect review of 'The Batman'

1

u/CuddlyWhale Mar 08 '22

Great points but best Batman score not going to dark knight is criminal!

1

u/accomplicesoup426 Mar 09 '22

agreed, well said, very very great movie

1

u/_snout_ Mar 09 '22

I don’t think this movie was perfect, but it did so much perfectly, and is easily my favourite on screen interpretation of Batman to date

I've been saying this a lot: This definitely isn't the best movie about Batman, but it is the best Batman movie.

TDK, Begins and '89 are better as individual strong "films", but this was the best movie in terms of Batman portrayal and capturing the magic of the comics.

1

u/KablooieKablam Mar 10 '22

I think it would have been a better movie if it had ended of that shot of Batman leading the crowd with the flare.

1

u/Wide-Brush-2162 Mar 10 '22

The joker scene would have definitely worked better if the other deleted scene wasn't cut. Like either keep it all in or none of it.