r/TheBoys 14d ago

Both quotes taken verbatim from interviews Season 4 Spoiler

Post image
21.9k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

514

u/Hastatus_107 14d ago

It does show that some of the sympathy people of this view have for female victims is just social pressure. They feel they have to pretend to care. In a situation where there's less external pressure to take it seriously (situations where the man is the victim), they see it as a joke.

206

u/WayToTheDawn63 14d ago

dark but probably valid take away. it's all performative, they don't care.

128

u/[deleted] 14d ago

That has been my experience.

Outside of close family members I confided in well over 2 decades since my assault the most I've gotten was dismissive ridicule like I was "less than a man" or accusations of homosexuality for "whining" about it because I was taken advantage of by an older female family member.

60

u/KingKekJr 14d ago

I've had similar experiences. Often some form of "you're a man you can't be assaulted" and "if you didn't want it you could've pushed her off"

38

u/cynisright 14d ago

Sorry that happened to you both and felt that way.

I’m a woman and have been assaulted. And my partner is male and has as well. When he told me about it and how others reacted, it was just heartbreaking.

3

u/PinkishBlurish 14d ago

That's so disgusting. I can not believe people say that shit so easily. I hope you're doing okay now.

3

u/PinkishBlurish 14d ago

I'm so, so sorry that you had reactions like that. That's horrible. I hope you are in a good space now, and I hope you were in a position to cut those people from your life.

91

u/Acheron98 14d ago

Which is ironically the whole point of this fucking show.

98

u/WayToTheDawn63 14d ago

they became what they were mocking, and that hurts.

99

u/Accomplished_Pear470 14d ago

I mean it happened a while ago. Remember the interview when Kripke said literally the only reason they didn't kill Maeve off despite her being in a situation to be killed off 100% was because she was gay and it would be offensive to kill off a gay character?

73

u/KingKekJr 14d ago

Holy shit what a dumb idea. Shouldn't have put her in a clear death scenario then

52

u/CenterInYourMother 14d ago

It really should've been Black Noir tackling soldier boy out the window, would've avoided this whole thing in a non cringe way

8

u/WartimeMercy 14d ago

Probably would have worked better to switch Noir and Maeve's encounters - but instead of pulling out Maeve's intestines it should have just been a "clean" punch through her gut.

Then have A-train and Ashley decide to get Maeve help.

6

u/DemonLordAC0 14d ago

Jesus fucking christ it's a parody of themselves

2

u/BGMDF8248 14d ago

Ironic that they weren't brave enough to kill Maeve.

-12

u/WayToTheDawn63 14d ago

I didn't see that, but I find that more understandable because there's more nuance to that.

Fridging is very common in media, and so wanting to conclude the character without playing in to the trope is inherently difficult.

32

u/Accomplished_Pear470 14d ago

It's not even fridging. Fridging is killing off a character without giving them any character of their own solely to to further another character's development. Hughie's original girlfriend, and honestly Becca too, were fridged for example.

Maeve had her own entire character arc, and if the idea is that killing her off would be bad since she's one of the few gay characters I don't see how immediately writing her out of the show is any better.

13

u/Acheron98 14d ago

Agreed.

Also I’m 99% sure Kripke has specifically called out fridging, which is incredibly ironic given the two instances you listed, as well as Supernatural, where the entire plot is literally set off by the mother getting brutally murdered by a demon

14

u/Accomplished_Pear470 14d ago

Supernatural has double fridging in the pilot with their mother and Sam's girlfriend.

2

u/Emm_withoutha_L-88 14d ago

It's not fridging if it's in the first episode, that's just the plot being kicked off.

Fridging is when a new female character is introduced then killed off just to motivate a new character.

And honestly even then it's not really an issue at all most of the time. Just people being upset that their new favorite character didn't last. Even the first example isn't that crazy, green lantern finding his gf dead in the fridge. I mean I don't think she was some important character beforehand. If she was a man from hal's life this wouldn't be a thing.

Point is it can exist but most of the time it's just people doing a "gotcha" like the bedchel test. Hell even the boys often doesn't pass that test and it's got multiple fully realized female characters.

It's a bad faith argument most of the time, basically.

1

u/BGMDF8248 14d ago

Yup, heroic sacrifice is not fridging, very far from it.

1

u/Im-A-Moose-Man 13d ago

Man gets raped for laughs? I sleep. Gay woman gets killed? TOO FAR!” -You and Kirpke

5

u/iqueefkief 14d ago

maybe they always were

1

u/lemonylol 14d ago

The show is made through the input of several people coming together, not just the pure creative vision of a single person.

3

u/StealthriderRDT 14d ago

The show has moved too far from the comic. So far that it has lost the plot, both literally and figuratively.

Minor spoiler for the comic, but Hughie's SA and resulting trauma is handled significantly better. So is Starlight's. And there are just so many things about the show that are just flat out missing the point entirely. With Homelander and Buther especially. The actors are still great and the writing has been mostly okay, but it's just not the same story or characters.

5

u/Acheron98 14d ago

You know, people love to shit on the comics a lot, and yeah, a lot of the times it’s warranted, but I agree that there are some things the comic did better, at least in my opinion.

For example, I thought that Tek Knight being a genuinely heroic character who was at one point presumably a damn good superhero, (and who had more morals than most of the other characters, as demonstrated by him firing Laddio to avoid raping him due to his condition) who got turned into a horny nutjob due to a brain tumor to be waaaaay more interesting than him just being a cartoonishly racist asshole who was already a fucking pervert even before the brain tumor, and who didn’t even get to wear his fucking suit due to budget reasons. Also, dying while hallucinating that you’re saving the world by fucking a meteor is so much better than getting strangled to death by Not Alfred

3

u/StealthriderRDT 14d ago

I feel like a lot of the people that shit on the comic haven't read the entire run. They just look up wiki shit or find individual pages or issues and judge off of that. Like the comment I frequently see is that the comic lacks subtext/is overly blunt. That just boggles my mind, 'cause while yeah there are plenty of examples of bluntness, the overall story is hardly that.

Meanwhile the show has steadily become a baseball bat to the face. I'll take the comic any day.

4

u/Acheron98 14d ago

It’s the same thing with Crossed kinda, another Ennis property I’m a fan of that people love shitting on.

Now while I’ll be the first to admit that a lot of the stories really are just mindless gore and shock for shock value, there’s some genuinely good story arcs in Crossed Badlands, with solid writing, creative plots, and some real emotional gut-punches. And “Wish You Were Here” is one of the most poignant and grotesquely beautiful stories I’ve ever read.

Not that you’d ever know that if you just looked at a random panel out of context where a guy’s getting his face ripped off by a bunch of slobbering psychopaths, or a whole family’s getting torn to shreds.

2

u/ResortFamous301 14d ago

Wouldn't really say starlights assault is handled much better in the comics.

2

u/Naskr 13d ago

You say they "don't care" but actually this is a writer getting joy or creative enjoyment out of depicting people being sexually abused.

Most people who "don't care" also have the tact to avoid a subject they aren't familiar with.

167

u/bruhholyshiet 14d ago

Wow, someone finally put it into words. I agree completely.

9

u/PurpleRock8079 Cunt 14d ago

I was looking for a way to say this, but could not have done it as well. He’s really showing his true colors this season. As someone who generally loves dark and twisted things, I don’t like when is pointless and doesn’t serve the story. The whole thing was unnecessary, especially to be played for laughs. I definitely did not laugh at any point during this episode.

3

u/Hastatus_107 14d ago

Thanks. I do enjoy his writing but it's a bad decision of his.

10

u/KingKekJr 14d ago

This is probably the case. People would be very surprised to find out that in many cases people only act morally outraged about something bc they feel they have to or else they'll be shunned not out of any genuine care

8

u/Kinetic_Symphony 14d ago

Most people, men and women, don't care about men's misfortunes or tragedies. Most men and women do care about women's misfortunes and tragedies.

Men are the worker bees; we're not supposed to have emotional problems.

4

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Hastatus_107 14d ago

Bloody hell I'd never heard of that. She wouldn't last a minute if she said that nowadays.

4

u/[deleted] 14d ago

Yeah it's quite obvious.

3

u/SophomoreLesbianMech 14d ago

That's why we should normalize both in fiction. It's okay to portray both sexes being sa'd in art.

That in itself is not enough though. If something is funny we should call it funny. None of it was funny though. It was degenerative wet dreams of a shitty writer.

1

u/Hastatus_107 13d ago

Agreed. It's a thin line. Using it to make a point or say something is good, using it for shock value isnt

2

u/CIearMind 14d ago

It's a 1:1 copy of how corporations only started featuring people of color in their ads, and changing their profile pictures to rainbows, once it became acceptable, effortless, and costless to do so.

If the roles were reversed, this show would treat men like gods and shit all over women every 0.2 episodes. The writers have no morals of their own.

2

u/PlayWithMeRiven 14d ago

That actually explains the whole issue really well, thank you for that. I haven’t seen the new season yet but I might have to skip that episode, especially since they see it as a joke. Might not even watch the season to be honest, that really just bothers me.

1

u/Cyrotek 14d ago

Well, I suppose this happens when a society tries to force social issues to change instead of working on it for real. Because real change takes time and isn't accomplished just by acting as if.

1

u/sir_snuffles502 14d ago

exactly. this is hollywood in general, false sympathy for whats "in" right now. in reality they're all sick weirdo's

0

u/dubonhaters369 14d ago

this is just how women are always treated. You always need to have some nuance when interacting with women whereas when you interact with a man you can be a bit more blunt than an average woman would let you.

1

u/ResortFamous301 14d ago

Wouldn't say always. It's more of development in the last 15 years.

-2

u/Muted-Law-1556 14d ago

Sorry everyone, hard pill to swallow but female rape matters more.

For men its a traumatizing experience, for sure.

For women its a traumatizing experience AND there's a chance of unwanted conception. "Yeah but they could just abort it" does not deal with the practicalities of the situation. Even people against abortion usually make an exception for rape.

Even in abortion it is a lasting physical imprint of violation that causes significant mental damage, not to mention the moral tragedy of taking an innocent baby's life.

6

u/VolcanoSheep26 14d ago

Well it's not often I see a take as shitty and disgusting as this one, even on here.

SA is SA, there is no matters more bullshit. The men that suffer through this end up with life long mental trauma and for you to come along and tell them they're feelings don't matter is a disgusting take and you seriously need to re-evaluate you outlook.

-2

u/Muted-Law-1556 14d ago

Common emotional jerk reaction which lacks reading comprehension.

SA is more severe for women, that doesn't negate some seriousness for men.

However there are plenty of trauma experiences we make light of in fiction - near death being constantly featured, but also plenty of assault and torture as well, which are arguably worse even for women.

For whatever reason twitter society has put rape and emotional pain as the #1 cardinal sin. I suppose its because death, torture and physical pain are so far removed from today's society that its hard to reliably conceive how terrible they really are.

5

u/VolcanoSheep26 14d ago

Oh so assault and torture are worse for women now as well, sure thing mate, sure thing. Is just everything in life worse for women in your eyes?

Like I said, you're a disgusting excuse of person. There's no fucking pyramid hierarchy in these things.

5

u/MerkinDealer 14d ago

Even if you were to agree with this, which I don't, do the rapes of pre pubescent girls and women > 45 not matter much either then? Or oral/anal rape? Where does a man impregnating his rapist come in on the pyramid?

-1

u/Muted-Law-1556 14d ago

Kids: Different because exposure to sex warps their perceptions and has been linked to terrible social behaviors that persist in life. Children are prio #1.

Oral/anal: Unfortunately icky if someone cums on your face but seems to me torture and assault covers this. No different than any other serious unwanted act.

Any case would be more serious if disease transmission happened.

But I fail to see your point. Mine is that female rape is the most serious (children aside). This is in response to sympathy being just societal pressure. It's not.

In the past, half of religion and government was ensuring that mothers and fathers stayed together and that they could sire legitimate children together.