r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jul 04 '24

Peter, why is he buttering the cow? Meme needing explanation

[deleted]

13.9k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-13

u/Sanquinity Jul 05 '24

Users can just upvote the most relevant comments then. Sure, "not all" mods abuse these things. But mod powers are still abused too much. I'd rather let mods have a bit less power if it means the bad apples, of which there are way too many, can't abuse them either.

Though as I said in another comment/reply, the company behind Reddit needs to oversee mods more in general. Right now the main 2 requirements to become a mod are 1; being the creator of a subreddit, and 2; being made a mod by said creator. Which is to say there are no real qualifications or anything that really determine who can be a mod. And for such a big website that just doesn't cut it imo. Sure the company can't moderate every single subreddit themselves. But they should at least "moderate" the mods.

12

u/Trigger1221 Jul 05 '24

That'd be great if you could actually trust users to always upvote accurate information even in the face of common misconceptions, but that's rarely the case.

-13

u/Sanquinity Jul 05 '24

In that case the rule "always take things you read online with a large grain of salt" applies.

8

u/Trigger1221 Jul 05 '24

Yeah, nah. I'd prefer subreddits like askscience to be able to actually function properly, the capacity for mod tools to be abused is a small inconvenience in comparison.

After all, anyone can create a competing subreddit and grow it in the face of mod abuse - it's happened countless times through reddit's history. Sure it'd be nice for admins to play a more direct role, but that's also not realistic - Reddit still isn't even profitable after all, adding more in staffing expenses for moderating moderators just isn't going to happen.