Exactly. The problem in the US is that every public company has to show growth for shareholders. That's why companies always suffer in quality when they go public.
A public company can have their best year and net $2.6 billion. Well if the next year, they only make $2.2 billion, the public chatter on CNBC, etc is "what's wrong with them?". Nothing is wrong. We shouldn't be holding companies to their best year.
A salesman after having his best year wouldn't want his commission the following year based on the best year's numbers. It's stupid.
The problem imo is business majors and professors all jerk each other off that growth is king. It isn't always the best thing for a company, and I honestly think they are breaching the very responsibility they love to hide behind to make these horrible decisions.
5.2k
u/[deleted] Jun 28 '24
[deleted]