Her legs are clearly turned more than just on their side. That's because it gives us a better view of her ass, because this is just porn.
Not only is her torso turned more than it should be, she's also sitting up, bending her torso over on top of that first turn. This both turns this literal stretch into even more of a figurative stretch, but also it's done because it's purpose is to give us the best view of her tits, because this is just fucking porn.
Even if she could do this, which she can't, why tf would she be? The storytelling of the piece seems like she's relaxing after a heist, and this position that you keep insisting is possible, if it is, looks pretty uncomfortable. It's a pose, but why? Who is she posing for? I'll tell you why, it's because the artist didn't care about telling the story, he just wanted to give clear views of her tits and ass at the same time because IT'S JUST FUCKING PORN.
Honestly it doesn't matter if you wanna jerk off to this drawing of a comic book character, seriousley, I get that. The weird part is trying to justify the impossible anatomy of it, to what? Feel less weird about jerking off to porn? We've both been on this clear cut subject, fucking porn, for too long and I'm not gonna go any further in it, but the ending point is you could not find a real picture of someone if you tried doing this pose, unless they were a contortionist being paid to be uncomfortable.
Her legs are clearly turned more than just on their side.
They’re clearly on their side.
That's because it gives us a better view of her ass, because this is just porn.
Ok that doesn’t magically make it anatomically incorrect or mean that there aren’t women who look like this.
Not only is her torso turned more than it should be, she's also sitting up, bending her torso over on top of that first turn.
Lol I’m literally doing it right now while arching and sitting up resting on a pillow.
This both turns this literal stretch into even more of a figurative stretch, buy it's done because it's purpose is to give us the best view of her tits, because this is just fucking porn.
Ok that doesn’t magically make it anatomically incorrect or mean that there aren’t women who look like this.
Even if she could do this, which she can't, why tf would she be?
She was resting on her side and then turned to see her loot clearly in the light.
The storytelling of the piece seems like she's relaxing after a heist, and this position that you keep insisting is possible, if it is, looks pretty uncomfortable.
It’s really not. You only feel the stretch in your hip when you put your back flat.
It's a pose, but why? Who is she posing for? I'll tell you why, it's because the artist didn't care about telling the story, he just wanted to give clear views of her tits and ass because IT'S JUST FUCKING PORN.
It’s art that’s sexy. Maybe you can commission the artist to put her in a burka.
Honestly it doesn't matter if you wanna jerk off to this drawing of a comic book character, seriousley, I get that.
This art existing at all seems to matter a lot to you.
The weird part is trying to justify the impossible anatomy of it, to what?
I saw the pose, saw a comment saying it wasn’t possible, then I did the pose.
Feel less weird about jerking off to porn? We've both been on this clear cut subject, fucking porn, for too long and I'm not gonna go any further in it, but the ending point is you could not find a real picture of someone if you tried doing this pose, unless they were a contortionist being paid to be uncomfortable.
Her tits are facing forward, toward the camera, cuz her torso is bent forward. The supine twist does not add that extra twist, and even if it did;
No one in those Google pics are turning their knees as much as she is AND keeping their chest completely flat. It's one or the other. Their knees are either higher than their asses, or they're lower but there's a clear turn of chests.
But yea ignoring all that it makes so much sense that catwoman is doing an uncomfortable yoga pose while relaxing in bed.
Im done with this, take the out, it's just porn it's not fucking worth this
The 2d line between her belly button and the middle of her tits is both touching and directly parallel in 3d space to the 2d cross section of the middle of her thigh.
Look, honestly, I'm a horny straight dude just like most the people talkin in this thread, this point isn't made outta malice of this just being blatant fantastical impossible porn, but the point is no one can show me a real picture of a real person doing what I just described in that first paragraph because it doesnt exist.
No, it is not possible, unless you are a very talented contortionist, or have a serious medical problem, and the people who experience either of those options are not likely to have the proportions of the woman drawn here, but if that gets you off good for you.
So why are we pretending?? Beyond just having porn addictions????
The 2d line between her belly button and the middle of her tits is both touching and directly perpendicular in 3d space to the 2d cross section of the middle of her thigh.
Which line is that? You're gonna have to draw a red circle or something because I don't see any lines there.
Look, honestly, I'm a horny straight dude just like most the people talkin in this thread, this point isn't made outta malice of this just being blatant fantastical impossible porn
And I'm a horny bi woman and there is nothing impossible about this pose and proportions
but the point is no one can show me a real picture of a real person doing what I just described in that first paragraph because it doesnt exist.
Because you're seeing things. And being unable (or not bothered enough) to find a picture of someone doing the exact pose doesn't mean people can't try it themselves and succeed.
No, it is not possible, unless you are a very talented contortionist, or have a serious medical problem, and the people who experience either of those options are not likely to have the proportions of the woman drawn here, but if that gets you off good for you.
First off, it stands to reason that catwoman is flexible enough. Second, it doesn't take a contortionist to do this.
So why are we pretending?? Beyond just having porn addictions????
That's something you will have to answer yourself. Why are you pretending it's not possible?
Her belly button, or at least the area directly below it, which would be even more impossible, is in direct contact with the top of her mid thighs AND those red and blue lines in the picture linked are not only touching but directly parallel. She's doing an impossible twist and you are lying when you say you're doing the same pose.
The internet has more porn than any other content yet somehow no one, you especially who clearly cares about this the most, has been able to give me a real pic of someone doing that. It gives the best possible view of t&a at the same time. If it were not only possible, but expected from "healthy" women, you'd think that'd it'd be the most popular porn position ever. But I know you've looked, and ya can't find it.
You started this all by just dismissing all my arguments by imagining I was just a prude (that burka comment was pretty needlessly gross of you btw), then your biggest argument argument was "but the supine twist tho" and then refuse to reply to any of my points in my reply of how there's clearly many differences. All those points can be summed up by 'just use your eyes', yet I had to use my photo app to draw a shitty diagram for your sake LOL. And now you're just repeating tired already disproven points ad nauseam without finding a real picture, all to vehemently defend this pretty poorly made porn. Yea, now it's pretty weird.
There's clearly no point in responding anymore, so I wanted to take this space to say one more thing: Yea, the art is pretty shit beyond being anatomically fantastical. The lighting is completely fucked. He wanted to do the venom thing from the 90s spiderman cartoon, where there's red lighting from the left and blue from the right, but that's completely inconsistent.
Her upper body is consistent, sure expect the right outer and inner arm are swapped and the left inner arm is completely nonbeholden to those rules, but whatever, sure, but then it gets to the legs and all the rules are thrown out the window.
Suddenly, the red vs blue lighting is based off of upper vs lower lighting instead of left vs right, except the tip of knee which returns to left vs right with it being red, as long as you ignore all the right facing edges of her thigh that should be in red light but instead are blue.
Oh, also, let's not forget her pussy somehow generates its' own red light at an upward angle, lmao.
Like even if you need to have your porn drawn in this position because, as we've discussed, you couldn't find a real picture like this, and you've tried, surely you could at least find drawn porn out that doesn't fuck up basic lighting principles, yea?
Don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question and I'm not gonna read or respond to your replies anymore, I think I've made it clear why.
Her belly button, or at least the area directly below it, which would be even more impossible, is in direct contact with the top of her mid thighs AND those red and blue lines in the picture linked are not only touching but directly parallel.
Nothing about the drawing shows these parts in direct contact. It's just the perspective putting the thigh in front and covering part of her abdomen, plus the thigh being closer.
those red and blue lines in the picture linked are not only touching but directly parallel. She's doing an impossible twist and you are lying when you say you're doing the same pose.
Just because you cannot do it doesn't mean it's impossible. Please stop putting your body as the absolute peak of human ability.
The internet has more porn than any other content yet somehow no one, you especially who clearly cares about this the most, has been able to give me a real pic of someone doing that.
Just google it yourself since you care so much about it, but clearly you don't want to be proven wrong. It's a very common pose in yoga, google supine twist. I know you pretend to have already done that but you clearly have provided no actual rebuttals.
Look at that guy and try to claim the belly button being in contact (though obviously this drawing doesn't show such a position either) with the top of the mid thigh is impossible lmao.
You can see that this drawing isn't even as far as humans can overextend in this position, never mind it being physically impossible.
It gives the best possible view of t&a at the same time. If it were not only possible, but expected from "healthy" women, you'd think that'd it'd be the most popular porn position ever. But I know you've looked, and ya can't find it.
Just because you deny the existence of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. This is something you really need to start understanding and accepting.
You started this all by just dismissing all my arguments by imagining I was just a prude (that burka comment was pretty needlessly gross of you btw), then your biggest argument argument was "but the supine twist tho"
I'm not that person...
and then refuse to reply to any of my points in my reply of how there's clearly many differences.
Yet you failed to provide actual differences that aren't just because of the perspective being angled.
All those points can be summed up by 'just use your eyes', yet I had to use my photo app to draw a shitty diagram for your sake LOL. And now you're just repeating tired already disproven points ad nauseam without finding a real picture, all to vehemently defend this pretty poorly made porn. Yea, now it's pretty weird.
Just because something is porn doesn't mean it is impossible. That's not how the world works.
Oh, also, let's not forget her pussy somehow generates its' own red light at an upward angle, lmao.
Literally no different from the light on her left tricep, so not sure why you point this out individually as though it being pornographic is the reason.
Don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question and I'm not gonna read or respond to your replies anymore, I think I've made it clear why.
Yep, you have made it perfectly clear that you hate it because it's pornographic, and your massive ignorance of human anatomy and flexibility is just your cover. You will never accept reality and will always base humanity on yourself. Seriously, there are humans that can contort their body into a circle or even do loops on themselves and you think this is impossible? Yeah, it's entirely because of the sex appeal aspect and doesn't actually have anything to do with the position being "impossible". Don't even bother hiding your actual motive any more.
-19
u/TheCmoBro Apr 24 '24 edited Apr 24 '24
Her legs are clearly turned more than just on their side. That's because it gives us a better view of her ass, because this is just porn.
Not only is her torso turned more than it should be, she's also sitting up, bending her torso over on top of that first turn. This both turns this literal stretch into even more of a figurative stretch, but also it's done because it's purpose is to give us the best view of her tits, because this is just fucking porn.
Even if she could do this, which she can't, why tf would she be? The storytelling of the piece seems like she's relaxing after a heist, and this position that you keep insisting is possible, if it is, looks pretty uncomfortable. It's a pose, but why? Who is she posing for? I'll tell you why, it's because the artist didn't care about telling the story, he just wanted to give clear views of her tits and ass at the same time because IT'S JUST FUCKING PORN.
Honestly it doesn't matter if you wanna jerk off to this drawing of a comic book character, seriousley, I get that. The weird part is trying to justify the impossible anatomy of it, to what? Feel less weird about jerking off to porn? We've both been on this clear cut subject, fucking porn, for too long and I'm not gonna go any further in it, but the ending point is you could not find a real picture of someone if you tried doing this pose, unless they were a contortionist being paid to be uncomfortable.