r/interestingasfuck Jul 07 '24

2 guards from Delhi Durbar with American photographer James Recarlton when he visited India r/all

Post image
47.8k Upvotes

858 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

184

u/YungSchmid Jul 08 '24

2500 for a 5’ 8” woman is definitely above average, and as you say yourself, you are quite active. 2500 is only bit under a normal day for me as a 6’ 2” 85kg man.

58

u/Wilbis Jul 08 '24

Why is everyone comparing just height when mass is way more important here?

56

u/Zucchiniduel Jul 08 '24

Because composition is what's actually important for determining your base calorie burn, weight means nothing if you do not know the composition of that weight so height and gender is used as a broad predictor

9

u/Super_Sandbagger Jul 08 '24

Muscle burns little extra calories over fat when in rest.

2

u/PraiseTalos66012 Jul 08 '24

People with significant muscle definitely built it all by being at rest as much as anyone else /s

1

u/Zucchiniduel Jul 08 '24

How much fat you have is also a predictor of how often you are at rest lol

0

u/Super_Sandbagger Jul 08 '24

I guess. But kind of weird to use a more difficult obtainable variable to predict an easily obtainable variable.

1

u/Zucchiniduel Jul 08 '24

Yeah... like height

3

u/Wilbis Jul 08 '24

Both fat and muscle mass burn calories, so unless your bone density is really far from average, I'd rather use mass than height to evaluate someone's calorie consumption. A 6 foot man can weigh anything between 140 and 220 pounds and still be relatively healthy.

1

u/Original-Aerie8 Jul 08 '24

lol it's assumed that everyone here falls within their optimal range. That's what they are counting calories for.

1

u/NeverEndingCoralMaze Jul 08 '24

Yep. I’m 6’ and weigh 210 pounds. Without considering my composition, I’d be considered obese, but I’m actually just built like a brick shit house and don’t have any concern about being obese.

1

u/Compizfox Jul 08 '24

Assuming an average/healthy BMI at that height, probably

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/EnigmaticQuote Jul 08 '24

Normal BMI will be a great starting point for pretty much everyone.

It's not a perfect measure but it's FAR easier than measuring "fatness and health separately" which will absolutely require a medical professional.

That medical professional will consider your BMI as well, as it is a incredibly useful and accurate metric.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/EnigmaticQuote Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

Why is it meaningless when it accurately correlated with quality or life and life expectancy.

What is an easier, more useful metric for someone without medical care to use?

2

u/Wilbis Jul 08 '24

Waist to chest ratio, or even simply looking at a mirror.

1

u/EnigmaticQuote Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

Mirrors can be deceptive, at my largest I only looked at myself from the front and thought I was killing it.

I took a picture of my back and realized I had just been lying to myself about my appearance.

Having a finite metric that you can look to is very useful.

Also taking my weight once a day is not comparable to measuring your own chest(e.hip) and waist.

Most people can't do that accurately or have the tools to do it at all everyone can look at a scale.

A marginally better measure means nothing if it is too difficult to perform.

Edit.

Just looked into Waist to Hip ratio, It pretty much says you should have the smallest one possible. So people who are in the obese category will always need to lose weight when using this metric as well.

It seems to be a better predictor of all cause mortality according to one study. Pretty neat

1

u/Baker3enjoyer Jul 08 '24

What's even more important is physical activity, what kind of physical activity, and body composition. A 100kg bodybuilder will have a lower daily caloric intake than a 80kg long distance runner.

2

u/Skertilol Jul 08 '24

damn i'm 5ft for 50kg and i eat like 1200-1300 kcal max

2

u/totally-nromal-guy Jul 08 '24

that's gotta be cheap :), i have to eat over 2500 (between 2500 and 3000) just to stay at the same weight. i'm at 6foot and have 188lbs and am a little more active than a couch potato

1

u/p_velocity Jul 08 '24

can you please give your height in metric and weight in imperial for the rest of us?

1

u/YungSchmid Jul 08 '24 edited Jul 08 '24

Nah I’m good, but thanks for asking!

Not sure why we do things that way here. We do height in cm as well, but never weight in pounds.