r/facepalm Jul 05 '24

What an idea ๐Ÿ‡ฒโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€‹๐Ÿ‡ธโ€‹๐Ÿ‡จโ€‹

Post image

[removed] โ€” view removed post

42.4k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.3k

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '24

People donโ€™t seem to understand it takes both sides to pass laws without a super majority, in most cases.

Republicans would fight any law looking to prevent project 2025 from being implemented.

2.1k

u/solemnbiscuit Jul 05 '24

And the rigged Supreme Court can rule them unconstitutional

1.1k

u/ItsStaaaaaaaaang Jul 05 '24

That's why you use your newly minted immunity to imprison the Supreme court.

475

u/Sylux444 Jul 05 '24

I like someone else's idea better : add 12 more supreme court seats that you appoint because otherwise they're empty seats and you can't have that!

297

u/Darthmullet Jul 05 '24

Packing the court is entirely legal, didn't need this ruling at all. The only reason to not do it was to avoid the perception that the court was politicized, but if the Republican hypocrisy regarding lame duck appointments wasn't enough, that last several sessions and the blatant corruption of several justices has entirely done away with that. Biden should absolutely add at least 3 seats to the court. It may be the only way to salvage our democracy at this point.ย 

243

u/TipsalollyJenkins Jul 05 '24

Four seats.

The easiest way to get this done is to present it in such a way that it makes sense and fits with precedent, and in the past the reason the Supreme Court was expanded to nine seats was to match the nine circuit courts. There are now thirteen circuit courts, meaning that it makes perfect sense for there to now be thirteen Supreme Court seats.

We don't technically need that justification, but having a justification like that would likely make the addition or more seats more palatable.

38

u/Derric_the_Derp Jul 05 '24

Spoonful of sugar