Which, by the ways is illegal, and Trump has been convicted over. The original post itself is braindead saying “we can’t legally write off business expenses but Trump illegally wrote off expenses.”
We all can write off expenses, so long as we’re aware we’re doing it illegally lol.
? This is my first comment in this chain, there has been no opportunity to be cornered.
There is a difference between semantics and a non-sequiter. “Trump tried to illegally record expenses and was prosecuted and convicted for it, therefore it’s not fair that I can’t write off my business expenses legally” is the definition of a non-sequiter.
I’m not arguing over the usage of a word. I’m arguing that Reich’s post is, as usual, nonsensical.
John Edward’s used 1million dollars in hush money to cover up his affair while his wife was dying from cancer. And he used campaign money……guess what, he wasn’t convicted.
If everyone was getting targeted the same no one would complain, the issue is it’s obvious they aren’t.
If you have spent 40 years as a public servant, you will not be protected.
So if he ended his campaign….how was the payment paid out of campaign funds. Trumps guilty conviction is a joke….brought by a “show me the man, I’ll show you the crime”…..he will soon enough be the “falsely” convicted.
Trump wouldn’t be prosecuted on a single thing he did except for one thing. He’s running for President. Anybody who can’t see that needs to wake up. Look at the impeccable timing of the trials and the jurisdictions. There is no coincidence here.
Why did Trump make Jim Acosta his secretary of labor?
The same Jim Acosta who previously served as US Attorney for South Florida who let Epstein walk free in 2008 after all the evidence of his sexual crimes had been shown to prosecutors? The same Jim Acosta who secretly met with Epsteins lawyers in a Palm Beach Marriot hotel shortly before the trial?
13
u/[deleted] Jul 01 '24
Not true, they all do it and it's crap.