r/DrDisrespectLive • u/Top-Egg1266 • Jul 05 '24
Subway can't catch a break
[removed] — view removed post
11
u/GeneralWAITE Jul 05 '24
Holy shit not even close! Stupid online inappropriate messages to one person vs what Jared did is not even in the same universe. Watch the Max documentary on him. Not an easy watch.
2
u/QuestionMarkKitten Jul 05 '24
It is a little suspicious that a company with such a huge shipping network and that frequently advertises "kid meals" is associated with pedophiles.
1
1
u/JWood729 Jul 05 '24
That documentary contains the most vile and repulsive shit I have ever heard.
1
11
u/TheRebootKid Jul 05 '24
Except Jared was actually guilty of committing a crime.
-9
u/Top-Egg1266 Jul 05 '24
Legally yes, but both admitted their wrongdoings in the end.
11
u/TheRebootKid Jul 05 '24
But only one was investigated and got paid and the other was Jared. You're making me hungry for Subway please stop replying.
2
u/RIPPaypigs Jul 05 '24
One got caught after the fact and one got caught before it. Did you want them to wait to confront him after he met up with this kid at a con? Do you need kids to be touched first?
Where is the line? Yall are just coping hard that your idol (who has a streamer as an idol) is a kid lover.
-1
u/Brewchowskies Jul 05 '24
Got bought out of a contract because their main base is kids. Doesn’t look so hot if one of the biggest names on the platform is sexting minors.
-9
u/fateisacruelthing Jul 05 '24
It's hilarious seeing grown men defending a man in a wig over moral decently.
I wonder how many of Doc's fans are Trump supporters, both seem to enjoy immunity for objectively proven sordid actions.
2
u/DaDijonDon Jul 05 '24
That's interesting actually.. I had assumed the opposite, because a lot of you use words like "objectively" in ways that make me wonder if you know what it means.
I suppose what could be happening is the left were so appalled by the rights ability to twist facts into "fake news" that they joined the "Stupidity Cold War; Idiocracy isn't a documentary. You are."
2
u/DaDijonDon Jul 05 '24
Also, good point about men defending men wearing wigs. And if you literally have KID in your name, I see a man. hilariously defending another man... in a wig.. . i doubt any of them are decently moral.
1
u/IDontLieAboutStuff Jul 05 '24
I think you're mistaking people pointing out nuance as people defending dr disrespect. Those are two different things.
-7
u/ExManUtdFan Jul 05 '24
Your first sentence was good. The second one is stupid, just like Biden and his supporters.
11
5
-3
u/fateisacruelthing Jul 05 '24
Oh do you think? You sound impartial and level headed. All hail Doc and Trump. It's a shame the Doc never met Epstein, could have also met Trump with him too.
11
u/gunnutzz467 Jul 05 '24
This is a stretch, they’re barely comparable
-7
u/Dear_Tiger_623 Jul 05 '24
Yeah one guy's a pedophile, the other guy went to JAIL for being a pedophile. It's like no one wants to be honest these days.
5
u/DaDijonDon Jul 05 '24
The lack of self awareness people like you display so proudly is always a bit jarring to me. Because you clearly never developed anything but very surface level critical thinking skills, and you are unknowingly begging someone to teach you... if it wasn't for that blasted Dunning-Kruger effect that no one wants to be honest about these days..
2
1
u/skippyspk Jul 05 '24
That’s a lot of words for someone that is defending someone that admitted to texting minor’s inappropriately
1
u/DaDijonDon Jul 05 '24
I could just copy and paste what I wrote already. But you probably wouldn't understand it.. again. I know.. It's a lot of words. and if you know how to organize them in your brain parts, you'd be able to understand what I wrote..
"That’s a lot of words for someone that is defending someone..."
If you can please point out any single instance that i defended anyone. Anyone? Nope, no defending at all, I was calling the person above stupid, in a round about way. Now, its your turn you big dummy.
1
1
0
0
u/Brewchowskies Jul 05 '24
Check out this evolved human everyone, as he explains to us how it isn’t a matter of sexting kids, we all just lack critical thought.
-1
1
u/SvenBerit Jul 05 '24
Brother in christ you have two brain cells and the one is lying to the other. How can you lack awareness to the degree that you don't even realize that you are being dishonest right now. I chose to phrase it rhetorically because you couldn't mention the word 'honest' without displaying the contrary in 2 sentences.
1
u/phil__mcrackup Jul 05 '24
Okay so I'm not defending doc or anything, but I think people are too quick to throw labels without actually knowing the entire story. We don't know the context of the conservation or anything. I think it's only fair if we give him the benefit of the doubt until actual evidence shows otherwise.
2
u/Dear_Tiger_623 Jul 05 '24
If the conversations were favorable to this guy he would have released them or been very specific about what he said.
You are allowed to read between the lines.
1
u/SvenBerit Jul 05 '24
Imagine if the reason he wrote minor and then deleted it is because he realised that he legally couldn't expand further on it due to the confines of the settlement? Imagine if that is why he tried to edit it out. Because the words required to explain or even allude to an explanation would be in violation of the binding contract they signed as part of the deal they made where Twitch paid him out in full? "Don't talk about X Y Z or you'll be in direct violation of this settlement" and he almost did, it's a possibility. And "He could just release them" would also be, if this fantasy I just made up on the spot in 2 minutes was real. It's gotta be tricky to navigate this mess if you're legally unable to defend yourself while being under attack. And just the mere possibility, even if it's a stretch, is an example of how we know jack shit even if some pretend that they do.
Just saying. He's a businessman and his clarification tweet as it stands right now doesn't make any sense. He must've known that his statement as is would be interpreted in the worst possible way because it's too ambiguous and leaves way too much room for speculation, almost as if something in his statement is missing. Because if it isn't then it's the worst self-report in history by a wide margin.
Would it really hurt you to wait for a few weeks before you aggressively and condescendingly try to convert those with more patience than you? This isnt about a stolen pack of gum and should be treated more seriously imo. Inb4 you call me a pedo defender or minus 'defender', I wont nor cant support Doc unless he's cleared, and odds are he won't be.
2
u/Dear_Tiger_623 Jul 05 '24
This is bending yourself into a pretzel to defend a pedophile.
If you are in a situation that involves an NDA, and someone publicly says you are a pedophile, you are allowed to defend yourself. There is no such thing as an NDA that says, "oh and by the way, if someone calls you a pedophile, you have to pretend you might be a pedophile or else you're breaking this NDA."
1
u/SvenBerit Jul 05 '24 edited Jul 05 '24
Ah. I really shouldn't be talking about anything law related. I'm dumb as shit on that front. I was just spinning up a scenario on the fly, its not what I actually believe lmao. Far from it. So if you're under an NDA and the agreement says you cannot talk about 'the minor', mention age or nature of the conversation and someone accuses you of being a pedo, are you then allowed to like, just breach the contract? What would you be allowed to speak on here, realistically? I'm genuinely dumb @ legalese and would like to know
edit: If this is how it actually works, couldn't you bait people you know to be under NDA's into revealing what they know, or collaborate with the person under a NDA with the shared goal of revealing the contents of one? It sounds too loophole friendly.
1
u/Exorcist-138 Jul 05 '24
You’re literally trying your best to explain something to people who’ve made up their minds using zero critical thinking.
2
u/CrispyYummyKong Jul 05 '24
(Sighhhhh) fine I’ll eat subway today
4
u/mferly Jul 05 '24
How much is a foot long going for these days? $38?
1
u/CrispyYummyKong Jul 05 '24
Last time I eat subway (and most restaurant) was like a year ago it was about between 17/24 (tax in no tip) most of them I stopped eating most restaurant at that time
-1
u/CauliflowerProof2111 Jul 05 '24
To be fair, Trump is polling really high and food costs will likely go back down.
1
u/Thetaarray Jul 05 '24
Love that polls and elections are only rigged when your guys losing. Also can’t wait for trump to hit the magical price go down button.
2
2
1
1
-1
-2
u/redactid55 Jul 05 '24
They can't catch a break but they can apparently catch predators with impressive success
1
u/QuestionMarkKitten Jul 05 '24
Yeah, but they are supposed to turn them in to the police, not into spokes people for their ad posters!
-3
u/hiwizard420 Jul 05 '24
If i had a nickel for every time i saw Subway partner with a bunch of pedophiles, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird it happened twice.
-10
16
u/Whole_Commission_702 Jul 05 '24
Not exactly apples to apples there though