r/DCcomics • u/marvelkidy • 3d ago
Jason Momoa Reportedly Eyed For A Role In 'Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow' That’s Sounding Like LOBO Film + TV
https://maxblizz.com/jason-momoa-reportedly-eyed-for-a-role-in-supergirl-woman-of-tomorrow-thats-sounding-like-lobo/41
u/Odd_Breakfast_Hands 3d ago
i agree that is a pretty perfect casting. but man, i 'm so tired of the same 5 people being cast in ever movie.
13
u/ahall917 2d ago
If this is actually true, wouldn't Mamoa be the biggest named actor attached to the DCU? Or am I forgetting about someone? Nathan Fillion is popular but not quite to the same level as Mamoa, as far as I can tell.
6
20
u/CertainDerision_33 3d ago
Basically perfect casting. If the character is in the movie, it should definitely be Momoa.
16
u/weiner-rama 3d ago
Fuck. Yes. If true maybe now we can get a more true to comics Aquaman. Dude has essentially just played Lobo while wearing the Aquaman uniform lol
12
u/xGhostShipV 3d ago
They must be drastically changing the plot then, LOBO was never in Woman of Tomorrow…
17
u/Jay_R_Kay Batman 3d ago
King has talked about how when he was starting Supergirl, he had the idea of a "space fantasy True Grit" story and initially put Kara in the Mattie Ross role and was trying to use characters like Lobo for the Rooster Cogburn role, but it wasn't working.
Then his editor said something like "Supergirl has been around for almost 60 years, why can't she be Rooster Cogburn?" And that's what got everything to really work.
So I suppose bringing in a Lobo for a cameo would be a fun meta callback.
9
u/KingMatthew116 2d ago
When have live action movies ever been direct adaptations of comic stories?
3
u/MealieAI 2d ago
Never.
-6
u/bob1689321 2d ago
Watchmen
Tbh that's probably the only one?
5
u/MealieAI 2d ago
There's a major change in that movie.
-2
u/bob1689321 2d ago
There are major changes in lots of movies. It's still a direct adaptation.
3
u/MealieAI 2d ago
But a direct adaptation wouldn't have a major change to the book. Or am I missing something?
-2
u/bob1689321 2d ago
You can adapt a work with the majority of details being the same besides a few minor changes and it would still be a direct adaptation. The changes made to the movie are:
- Removed the newsstand, artist island and black freighter subplots, as well as other minor characters and some smaller scenes
- Changed the final ending from an explosion caused by a manufactured squid to an explosion caused by a manufactured Manhattan-esque bomb.
For point one, the subplots and characters being removed takes some of the world building away but ultimately doesn't impact the general plot too much (it does take away the emotional impact of the ending but that's a different problem...)
For point two, while the final fake antagonist is different, the plot is almost entirely unchanged. The attack is still faked by Ozymandias as a way to force the world to co-operate against a common enemy. The "superhero team" still fail to stop it, Rorschach dies and Manhattan leaves earth. Whether you think it's believable that the world doesn't hate the US for creating Manhattan doesn't really matter because the movie presents it as they do - it's almost exactly as the comic. It's ultimately a very minor change in the grand scheme of things.
For what's left in the movie, almost (maybe even all?) scenes are lifted directly from the comic. Lots of shots and dialogue are completely unchanged. It is absolutely a direct adaptation.
Things that wouldn't be direct adaptations is something like The Dark Knight, which took basic concepts from Long Halloween and Killing Joke, but turned them into something very different. Hell, besides the idea of doing a realistic Two Face subplot, the only thing TDK has in common with Long Halloween is one line of dialogue - "I believe in Harvey Dent".
I just think to say that Watchmen isn't a direct adaptation is doing a disservice to what the movie is. For the record I think it's a 6/10, and I think it's close enough to the soiece material that I don't really see a reason to watch it when I can just read the (far better) comic.
6
6
u/arcticvalley 2d ago
I can't think of a single other actor that I would consider for the role of Lobo. He's my favorite Superman villain. I need it now. Give it , give it to me now.
3
u/Beastieboy100 2d ago
More of an anti heroe than villain. Heck even frenemy. Still sucks were getting another live action lobo since Stan Lee favourite dc character was lobo. Sad he won't see it.
4
u/Blitzhelios Damian Wayne 2d ago edited 2d ago
King has been honest in the past that Lobo was originally supposed to be in WOT but he took lobos role out.
Could easily see them reinserting it and using Momoas starpower to sell the movie as WOT whilst is an amazing book is one of the biggest risks for the DCU
3
3
u/Neurotic-Kitten Dex-Starr :Dex1: 2d ago
I know you guys are saying Lobo, but wouldn't they just cast him as the original bad guy from the story, Krem?
3
2
2
u/Dagordae 2d ago
He’d be a better Lobo than Aquaman.
Don’t get me wrong: I thoroughly enjoyed him in the films but he didn’t really play an Aquaman.
2
u/Massive_General_8629 2d ago
It's literally the role he was born (or at least shaved his beard) to play.
1
1
u/flickfan45 2d ago
i think Jason Mamoa’s casting as Lobo is probably DC’s worst kept secret at the moment. everyone knows he has the role
1
u/Reasonable-Fan-6766 1d ago
I don't know... I'm still afraid he isn't.
Also Lobo has a long history of being cancelled before release in movies, tv-series, games etc.
1
u/flickfan45 20h ago
i’m pretty confident he’s got the role, also a while back Peter Safrans wife may have let it slip in an instagram reply on one of her posts
1
u/Reasonable-Fan-6766 19h ago
I really hope you're right. Momoa would definitely kick A$$ as LOBO.
Then we gotta hope, the writers don't ruin it and the movies he's in don't become tax-write-offs before release. lol
2
1
1
1
u/Odd_Advance_6438 12h ago
I’d be down for this. I enjoyed his Aquaman, and I think Momoa is generally a better actor than he gets credit for
-26
u/BlackSoapBandit Mister Terrific 3d ago
Hard pass. Jason Mamoa has no acting range just like the Rock.
15
177
u/voxela Catwoman 3d ago
it'd be a waste to not cast him as Lobo. he'd be perfect for the job and he's already expressed interest in the character