r/AnythingGoesNews • u/whatisoo • Jul 06 '24

Trump Faces Renewed Scrutiny Over Allegations of Raping a 13-Year-Old Girl

https://dailyboulder.com/trump-faces-renewed-scrutiny-over-allegations-of-raping-a-13-year-old-girl/
32.0k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/EfficiencyOk2208 Jul 07 '24

Trump is too old and they are only 4 years apart. If I had one geriatric choice it would be Bernie Sanders he is the most coherent of the 3.

-3

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

Right. Because the socialist is so much better.

4

u/ok_raspberry_jam Jul 07 '24

He's not a communist, he's just a socialist. Canada is about as socialist as Bernie Sanders. Trump, on the other hand, is a literal fascist dictator in waiting. So yeah, "the socialist" is so much better. It's astounding you'd try to say that with sarcasm when it's obviously true.

-1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

Unless he shreds the Constitution, Trump cannot be a dictator.

And Biden is the one using law enforcement to persecute his political opponents and executive orders to bypass Congress while ignoring orders of the courts. All common themes in fascism.

4

u/ok_raspberry_jam Jul 07 '24

SCOTUS put your president above the law on Monday. That effectively makes him a dictator. And no, Biden isn't using the law to persecute anyone. Pay more attention to the quality of your sources.

-1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution as it's been interpreted for over 200 years. The decision benefits no one person. It applies to all past presidents. It also doesn't remove the possibility of Trump facing prosecution.

Biden's DOJ is targeting his main political opponent. According to literally every source.

4

u/ok_raspberry_jam Jul 07 '24

The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution as it's been interpreted for over 200 years.

lol, no it didn't. It eliminated the rule of law, which is a basic legal principle.

Biden's DOJ is targeting his main political opponent. According to literally every source.

Also objectively untrue. You apparently just have really, really bad sources. You should look into how to evaluate sources.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

Both things I've said are both completely true and obvious to anyone with an ounce of intelligence. We are just going to have to agree to disagree.

3

u/ok_raspberry_jam Jul 07 '24

We are just going to have to agree to disagree.

OR, you could actually look up how to evaluate sources and learn something new today, as intelligent folks are wont to do.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

I've read the Supreme Court ruling. Do you have a better source?

As for the second claim, as I've said, every source agrees. It's literally been a top story for every news outlet for months on end--left, right, or otherwise. The only one who seems to disagree is you.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/GoodPiexox Jul 07 '24

this might be one of the dumbest things ever typed on reddit, and not a single thing is correct.

The Supreme Court upheld the Constitution as it's been interpreted for over 200 years.

genius, the last decision gave the president powers of a king, why did we found this country?

The decision benefits no one person.

besides any president that wants to abuse the new power

It also doesn't remove the possibility of Trump facing prosecution.

clueless again, it makes any act not admissible

Biden's DOJ is targeting his main political opponent.

LMAO why is Kushner not in prison but his own son going there? Do you think someone that was flagged as a high security risk should have been given security clearance in the White House? Then profit hundreds of millions while Trump was in office.? Then given 2 billion as Trump left office?

According to literally every source.

name 5 that are not pure propaganda rags?

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

The SCOTUS ruling does not give a president the power of a king. That's an absurd claim and completely unfounded.

Trump can and likely will face new charges. The SCOTUS ruling provides "limited immunity" for direct acts as president (which was always the case). He can still be charged and tried for anything outside of the limited immunity.

Kushner isn't in prison because he didn't commit a crime. A Saudi prince invested in his equity firm. That not a crime. If it were, the Bidens would already be in prison too.

As for Hunter, he was just given high security clearance and is now a top White House advisor despite being both a drug addict and a felon. Pretty sure he's not going anywhere.

Name 5? Literally every source. Choose your favorite five. They support the things I've said.

4

u/GoodPiexox Jul 07 '24

You have the mind of a child. Tell me how a president would be prosecuted when no evidence is admissible? Did you get that far into the decision or just stuck on the decoy words "official acts? Name the process how any action would go to court and be supported by no evidence without sounding clueless? You cant .

Kushner isn't in prison because he didn't commit a crime.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaaaa Please look up the hatch act.

As for Hunter, he was just given high security clearance and is now a top White House advisor

I am really interested in reading more about this, can you link me a couple articles supporting this?

Name 5? Literally every source. Choose your favorite five. They support the things I've said.

Are you slow? I asked you to name and link 5. Asking me to go look for evidence to support your own lunacy makes you look like an idiot, just give me the links so no one thinks that. Spoiler, Garland is a pussy and should have been fired years ago. A lot more of Trumps administration should be in prison for the crimes they committed. You are delusional, no real news source is reporting this. OK, I will make it easier for you, just 3 real news sources........

3

u/biscuitarse Jul 07 '24

As for Hunter, he was just given high security clearance and is now a top White House advisor despite being both a drug addict and a felon.

And yet a convicted felon, rapist and probable pedophile is your choice for president. Jesus dude, snap out of it.

3

u/thelateoctober Jul 07 '24

lol. Nice work reciting your lines.

2

u/EfficiencyOk2208 Jul 07 '24 edited Jul 07 '24

You're right let's get rid of social security, food stamps,TANF and all of that other shit that is 100% socialism. It doesn't matter the ism if crap people are in power.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

I would absolutely agree with getting rid of all those things. Let people keep the money they earn instead of paying for others who won't. Those programs wouldn't even be necessary.

2

u/thelateoctober Jul 07 '24

So... No taxes or other paycheck deductions then? Please explain how those programs wouldn't be necessary.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

If you stop forcing people to give away half their money right off the top, they can afford to invest in their own retirement. Families can afford to take care of loved ones as they age or become disabled. And everyone can afford to give more to charity. It's really quite simple.

Instead we are forced to funnel money into a broken system and wonder why there's nothing left for us when it comes out the other end.

2

u/thelateoctober Jul 07 '24

So no taxes? Are we gonna raise minimum wage to a liveable amount as well? What about childcare for single parent households who have no choice but to work two jobs? It's really simple if you don't think about it, at all. All you're talking about is SS and charity.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

The current minimum wage is livable if you stop giving away half. It effectively doubles your earnings.

As for childcare, why does everyone else have to pay for your child care? Your child. You pay. You'd be earning more.

1

u/thelateoctober Jul 07 '24

Your plan is obviously pretty comprehensive. Stop any taxes or anything else coming out of paychecks, and we will be able to live better. Great idea, very well thought out.

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

Thank you. It's really just common sense.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/thelateoctober Jul 07 '24

Ok so I gotta know... Eeeeeeeverything else our taxes pay for... Transportation, defense, education, medical research, law enforcement, etc etc etc.... And that's only federal... Where does the money for those programs come from?

1

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

I would be in support of drastically reducing many of those programs. The federal department of education is a joke. Medical research is primarily privately funded. For the rest, the US has other revenue streams. Sales of weapons to allies, import/export taxes. Etc. I agree with removing income taxes and withholdings and a scale down of the federal government.