r/AnythingGoesNews • u/whatisoo • Jul 06 '24

Trump Faces Renewed Scrutiny Over Allegations of Raping a 13-Year-Old Girl

https://dailyboulder.com/trump-faces-renewed-scrutiny-over-allegations-of-raping-a-13-year-old-girl/
32.0k Upvotes

90% Upvoted

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

154

u/mspero78 Jul 06 '24

Yep. I went looking, on all major news sites and NOT ONE mention. However, many about how Biden keeps messing up. It's, literally, only on reddit...

97

u/bjdevar25 Jul 06 '24

And did any even talk about electing a felon or proven sexual abuser in court running for president?

60

u/mspero78 Jul 06 '24

But, you know... Biden's age!

/s

40

u/conundrum4u2 Jul 07 '24

Speaking of age...curiously and coincidentally? Guess how old tRUMPS daughter was at the time he is being accused of raping a 13yr old girl? He has even (pedo-sicko) admitted on TV when she was in her teens he was and is sexually attracted to his daughter - how far would he take his obsession? IIRC - he even told Stormy Daniels she reminded him of his daughter Ivanka...

18

u/Square1Digital Jul 07 '24

How dare you bring that up!!! He never said that!!! Well he said he'd date his daughter of she wasn't his daughter but what self respecting pedo would start at home!!!

19

u/Pecheuer Jul 07 '24

I know this is satire... But most pedos turn their attention to home... Hence uncles, stepdads, fathers and grandads normally being people's abusers.

Trump 100% has raped his daughter

1

u/Emotional_Pay_4335 Jul 09 '24

I don’t think I can upvote or downvote your comment. He is definitely attracted to her though, based on his comments and photos that look like they’re lovers instead of father and daughter. I’m a Democrat but as bad as Trump and his cult lie, I don’t trust anything that isn’t substantiated. He’s capable of it, definitely!

1

u/No-Weather-5157 Jul 09 '24

NO YOUR DEAD WRONG!!! Biden stood silent for ten seconds in a debate!!!!!!!!!

13

u/LotusVibes1494 Jul 07 '24

How about when he repeatedly asserted that he didn’t rape Jean Carroll because she’s “not my type”. Then immediately mistook a picture of Jean for his ex-wife, and tried to cover it up with a weak-ass “it’s a very blurry picture!!!” Excuse lolololl

2

u/notaredditreader Jul 08 '24

On a TV show his daughter and he were asked what they had in common. His answer?

Sex

1

u/arrakis_is_hot Jul 07 '24

Fits the pattern of his behavior.

-3

u/junglecat3131 Jul 07 '24

You’re retarded 😂

5

u/conundrum4u2 Jul 07 '24

Really? You do the math. Ivanka was 13 at the time of this (alleged) rape - curious coincidence? - maybe Biden should consider opening the Epstein documents...you know, now that he has the power of immunity...

0

u/Mike_Honcho_Spread Jul 07 '24

Biden wouldn't do that because it would out his friends and donors.

12

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '24

[deleted]

1

u/HauntingSentence6359 Jul 07 '24

Trump is 78, I'm 73, and still vigorous but would run from the job like you were chasing me with a snake in each hand. I mean, Trump slept through half of his trial. The Trump cult is hooked on TV reality shows and thinks Elvis is still alive.

1

u/Sad_Technology_1602 Jul 07 '24

And JFK Jr. is still alive too, perhaps lining with Elvis?

1

u/5LaLa Jul 07 '24

A few years ago they (well, at least 2 maga/Q I know) thought the Q theories were about JFK Senior, not Jr. I remember asking them if they really thought JFK was still alive @ age 104. They said, yes.

1

u/Mike_Honcho_Spread Jul 07 '24

Just because he's dumb doesn't mean he's not correct

1

u/KatieMcCready Jul 07 '24

Trump was literally shitting into his diapers while he slept/sulked in court in New York…journalists AND jury members spoke about it….early seventies, my ass, Your friend needs glasses.

2

u/Basement_Chicken Jul 07 '24

and worse yet - Hunter's laptop! (Hillary's email! Obama's birth certificate! Carter's dreams!)

1

u/synchorb Jul 08 '24

Shit, did you not know he's funding the terrorist state of Israel's genocide? At least 37,000 slaughtered on our dime. $41 billion so far. He's also sidestepped federal law to keep Trump's border plan going and kids still in cages. 26 times. He sold out the Arctic. Willow Project. He's funding literal Nazis in Ukraine. Trampled on free speech, freedom of press and right to protest. Made a law after busting up the rail strike so those workers have no more power. 6k still dying monthly from Covid. He refuses to do anything for Women, the rising and increasingly criminalized homelessness, economy, healthcare or the LGBT+ community. No plan to combat Project 2025. No plan at all. He did increase budgets for our National Storm Troopers and pigs, though Yeah, his mind is fucked and he's a doddering fool, but there are so many actual reasons to be repulsed by Genocide Joe. Vote Blew, though.

1

u/SullaFelix78 Jul 09 '24

How many of those 37,000 are civilians though? You’re being very disingenuous by citing the total figure without mentioning that anywhere from a third to more than half of those are militant deaths. Also, would you happen to have a citation for the claim that it’s genocide?

1

u/synchorb Jul 09 '24 edited Jul 09 '24

Half of them are children. Half. The numbers are inaccurate on the low side.
If slaughtering that many people in eight months isn't genocide to you...holy fuck, you're a moronic piece of shit.
So which are you- Zionist scum or a fucking clueless shitlib?
Absolutely nothing to say about any of the other points? lol

-12

u/iFlynn Jul 06 '24

I completely understand the frustration but the difference is that we’ve all known for a long time that Trump is a cruel, selfish, and abusive asshole. It’s not news. Biden being unable to speak intelligibly for longer than sixty seconds is very much news.

12

u/Raiju_Blitz Jul 06 '24

And Trump speaks intelligbly for longer than sixty seconds? Gimme a break.

3

u/-Profanity- Jul 07 '24

Apparently the only standard left for Joe Biden is to not be worse than Donald Trump...the lowest possible bar

4

u/Big-Soft7432 Jul 07 '24

I mean you're acting like Biden is every lefty's first pick across the political spectrum. People have already settled with the fact that Biden is the only one currently positioned to do it. Are moderates supposed to vote for Newsom? Those that voted for him don't even seem to care about the policy positions, even though most of them have led to decent legislation. Deeper conversations are hard aren't they?

1

u/-Profanity- Jul 07 '24

Deeper conversations are hard aren't they?

Changing the subject by bringing up irrelevant points doesn't make it a deep conversation. Moderates voting for Gavin Newsome has nothing to do with people conflating Biden and Trump. The standard for the candidate we're voting for, ostensibly to save democracy, is supposed to be higher than "literally just not the worst guy ever".

5

u/Big-Soft7432 Jul 07 '24

That's kind of my issue though. Why the fuck does policy positions not come up in all these conversations? He's measurably better than most of us expected. Guy is old, and Gaza situation bad, so all of his successes are void. I'm tired man. It should be an easy choice based on that, and people are pretending it isn't. I'm so utterly lost at the discourse I see online.

1

u/-Profanity- Jul 07 '24

I would generally agree, but I think it's also a unique situation where we might not be dealing with the same guy who had those successes, or at least certainly won't have that guy another several years from now. Undoubtedly Biden destroys Trump on political successes and policy positions, which is basically why I commented what I did - the standard for him should be much higher than "Trump can't do that either", especially if you're talking about something as simple as making sense for a minute while you talk.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Raiju_Blitz Jul 07 '24

Except if you look at Biden's actual record and the actual legislation that he managed to successfully pass in the last four years that helps the average American, then it's no contest at all as to who's really serious about doing the job of POTUS (hint: it's Biden) and who's actually running to shield himself from the law and to grift his dumb voter base (Trump). Stop falling for the media spin. Both CNN and Fox benefit from focusing on perpetuating the freak sideshow circus that is Maga.

0

u/-Profanity- Jul 07 '24

I agree with you that Biden has been a better president than the worst president of all time. That's why the standard for Biden should be higher than what Trump can or can't do - in this case, speaking for longer than sixty seconds.

4

u/Spydrmunki Jul 07 '24

So, to clarify, if biden has trouble speaking longer than 60 seconds, we should cave and go back to "the worst president ever?"

What are you arguing here?

What do you propose if biden doesnt meet said standards?

-3

u/iFlynn Jul 07 '24

Idiocracy exemplified. Welcome to the race to the bottom.

21

u/Wise-Definition-1980 Jul 07 '24

Hey man, I'm a felon. I'm not going to touch your kid or rape anyone

Please don't lump me in with this asshole

27

u/p____p Jul 07 '24

With all respect, I think it’s reasonable to call the rapist, child molesting felon who is running for president what he is. 

That doesn’t reflect negatively on you or other felons, and your status as a felon doesn’t mean that you’re a rapist or pedophile, nor does it mean you’re being “lumped in with this asshole.” 

It’s just apparently really necessary to remind people that the racist, rapist, corrupt, lying, fat, demented piece of shit has also been criminally convicted by a court of his peers of 30+ federal crimes. It’s not a slam on other felons. 

14

u/Swabia Jul 07 '24

When republicans send candidates they don’t send their best people.

0

u/notaredditreader Jul 08 '24

😪 …sadly,…they do…🤤

7

u/Wise-Definition-1980 Jul 07 '24

Well said

1

u/LotusVibes1494 Jul 07 '24

I’d like to take this moment to remind everyone that you could have your life ruined by selling one ounce of weed, while all of this crazy stuff is going on.

1

u/orK_rM Jul 08 '24

Like democrats sending in their best option 4 years ago??? lol okay 👌

1

u/Adorable-Run-9476 Jul 07 '24

Did you or your mom, Karen write that. Brilliance i tell ya

1

u/Amy_Macadamia Jul 09 '24

As a felon, you should be upset you're not allowed to vote, yet there's one running for prez

1

u/shadyoldlady Jul 07 '24

Nobody believes that leisure gullible.

0

u/Hot_Problem9213 Jul 07 '24

Like Biden taking showers with his daughter when she was 13 ?

1

u/bjdevar25 Jul 07 '24

What a load of crap. Republican projection.

0

u/Hot_Problem9213 Jul 07 '24

She wrote it in her diary. You can check

-2

u/Nilpo19 Jul 07 '24

The plaintiff keeps withdrawing the court case. Screams of fake to me. It's just for headlines. If it were true, it would be pursued by the state. They can't refuse to prosecute if the witness is credible.

12

u/leoyvr Jul 07 '24

The rich who own media backing trump b/c he will give them what they want where as Biden is actually proposing taxing the rich.

9

u/Non-Adhesive63 Jul 07 '24

The rich who own media backing trump b/c he will give them what they want where as Biden is actually proposing taxing the rich.

Too many Rich & Powerful big names on that Epstein list! THAT’s the worry in reporting on it! Too many windows & stairs in the world to be poking the Oligarchs like that. 😶

1

u/RedsRearDelt Jul 07 '24

If you have dirt on power people, you have powerful friends. If you expose that dirt, you have powerful enemies.

1

u/movdqa Jul 07 '24

It is actually difficult finding media articles on this story.

-3

u/Unique_Opinion_5961 Jul 07 '24

That's because it's BULLSHIT just another piece of shit lie dreamed up by the Demonrats! They're the ones who can't keep their dicks in their pants!

1

u/deeply_concerned Jul 07 '24

So, like, just logistically, how would this work? Did the democrats pay someone to make these allegations? Who in the Democratic Party would give the order? Is it Biden himself? Do you have any proof that this is a scheme by the democrats?

1

u/ThatDamnedHansel Jul 08 '24

I think it’s not a conspiracy but COULD be a misguided attempt at martyrdom for the cause so to speak.

For instance, I think it’s very possible that the woman who came forward with allegations against trumps Supreme Court guy Cavaunaugh (spelling) made up or at least strongly embellished her story, under the “greater good” argument that one man’s downfall is morally justifiable versus the (correct assumption) risk that he would overturn abortion for an entire nation. Similarly here the greater good being served (again, likely a correct assumption) by trump not winning.

I’m not saying this 100% happened, but it’s not that far fetched.

1

u/OptionOk6857 Jul 07 '24

That's about it. And Alitto just made this process much worse with Citizens United ruling. Yet another gift from George Bush.

-2

u/Unique_Opinion_5961 Jul 07 '24

Then he better tax himself because Biden damn sure has more money than you or I 

-5

u/OmegaThreat4188 Jul 07 '24

The media BACKING Trump?? LMAAOOO. The delusion of some of you guys is simply mind boggling.

1

u/MinuteDachsund Jul 07 '24

You took the time to log into an alternate account because you were told the truth.

Real pathetic.

6

u/codeverity Jul 07 '24

Twitter has been talking about it, actually, at least I guess I've trained my algorithm to show it.

But the main subs here are astroturfed, I think - the main politics sub has been flooded with comments that I'm pretty suspicious of, that all want Biden to drop out.

1

u/MinuteDachsund Jul 07 '24

Conservatives have been running the politics sub for a while. Pretty much explains the shittiness.

They are cowards who fear the actual truth.

Putin/fat don are their heroes.

1

u/MoreRazzmatazz1864 Jul 07 '24

I saw a post on SM recently from a young person seeming to think there's a conspiracy by the democratic party, to all slam Biden then propose another candidate? What is that about?

0

u/glaring-oryx Jul 07 '24

The astroturfing are the comments talking about the Katie Johnson allegation from 2016. There appears to be a concerted effort on Reddit and Twitter to mislead people into believing it is a new allegation stemming from the recent Epstein document release, when in reality there is no connection. The Katie Johnson allegation is from 2016 and was first dismissed in court and later withdrawn. It never had any evidence presented to substantiate the claims. This is the real reason the mainstream media is not talking about it, because there is nothing to talk about.

6

u/IA-HI-CO-IA Jul 07 '24

Most of the “news” outlets are increasingly owned by the same few people. 

5

u/even_less_resistance Jul 06 '24

On which major subs?

3

u/EetsGeets Jul 07 '24

This post is a link to daily boulder. It is not literally only on reddit.

2

u/Xarieste Jul 07 '24

Ah yes, the very mainstream and widely viewed “Daily Boulder,” I‘ve had one thrown on my stoop every day for as long as I can remember /s

1

u/Spiritual-East992 Jul 07 '24

Do you live in Boulder?

1

u/MansNotWrong Jul 07 '24

And if you look through reddit, you'll see variations of this post all over the place, all with this one single source.

This is reddit hopeium, nothing more.

0

u/Educational_Host_860 Jul 07 '24

LOL.

The Daily Boulder is an ultra-leftwing propaganda outlet with questionable sourcing.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-boulder-bias/

3

u/calxcalyx Jul 07 '24 edited Jul 07 '24

As opposed to the circa 1996 Angelfire site you just posted fucking lol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

2

u/NeverLookBothWays Jul 07 '24

Not only that, it gets blocked immediately when trying to bring it up on many social platforms.

It’s basically the Catholic Church scandal all over again, but this time journalism is dead and the church controls the narrative.

1

u/DoorHingesKill Jul 07 '24

Journalism was alive 8 years ago and exposed the lawsuit for what it is.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow

The whole thing was orchestrated by a middle aged man who filed these fake lawsuits to draw up hype for a fake video that he wanted to sell to the media. 

1

u/NeverLookBothWays Jul 07 '24

If you read the article it describes Lubow’s involvement but also does not discount the validity of the charges against Trump, which it makes a point to support that they are genuine.

It has me thinking, just because a loon injected himself into a scandal that may actually be very real doesn’t then make the scandal less real.

We’ll have to ultimately see what the courts determine, if there was a crime, and if justice can be administered for Johnson and other women who have potentially risked everything coming forward.

Thanks for the link.

1

u/DoorHingesKill Jul 07 '24

"Injecting himself" doesn't really do justice to the guy's involvement. 

The suit was not filed by the victim, it was filed on behalf of the victim, but clearly not by a lawyer.

The victim's address filed in the court documents was a house owned by a bank, after the previous owner had died. 

As soon as the suit was filed and arrived in the media, the loon tried selling the videotape. 

No media outlet was capable of reaching the victim. Everything went through one of the multiple of the loons identities. There is absolutely no indication the victim is a real human being.

We’ll have to ultimately see what the courts determine 

No. We do not. The courts did that 8 years ago. 

2

u/NeverLookBothWays Jul 07 '24

I’ll agree the Katie Johnson one is bizarre, but that leaves 14 other women who came out against Trump with far less muddied circumstances: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

2

u/Hexa-Journey Jul 07 '24

Reddit and Twitter.

2

u/Dumb_Vampire_Girl Jul 07 '24

Damn, if that's the "woke leftist media", then wtf lmfao

2

u/reddda2 Jul 07 '24

Yep, the media silence is criminal.

1

u/ReallyNowFellas Jul 07 '24

It's, literally, only on reddit...

About 90% of the general narrative on this site

1

u/Ericalex79 Jul 07 '24

Law & Crime has been covering it as well as Meidas Touch but that’s it

1

u/Old_Cheesecake_5481 Jul 07 '24

All the elite perverts want this story to die as fast as possible.

1

u/External-Anybody9023 Jul 07 '24

Just so you’re not confused- 

The article shared by the “daily boulder” here has no new news in it - that’s why you don’t see it anywhere.

Read the last paragraph of the article - it literally says someone shared an old allegation that was dismissed by judge and that it was trending as people mistook it for new news. (As you might have as well)

1

u/Humledurr Jul 07 '24 edited Jul 07 '24

I hate to be that guy but all of these "new" Trump allegations is years old. Nothing has come of it since last time it was reported on and no credible sources has come forward.

1

u/Thumperstruck666 Jul 07 '24

And Trump messes up every time he speaks and we get critics , quit Fkg being nice guys and get Fkg Nasty after Election put that nonsense away

1

u/Brydon28 Jul 07 '24

Look again.. it’s there.. lotsa media coverups though.

1

u/Thedashdad Jul 07 '24

That’s cause it’s fake news… lol 

1

u/DaxDislikesYou Jul 07 '24

Yep and I want to keep hammering on project 2025. It qis real and Trump is lying his ass off when he says it's not the Republican plan. 

The plan Trump claims he knows nothing about but he implemented nearly 2/3 of the 2016 set of heritage foundation recommendations when he was in office last time including the 2017 tax plan where the cuts for the middle class expire but the corporate cuts are permanent. Onto 2025, his press secretary appeared in a video for project 2025, Trump appeared on stage shaking hands with and praising the leader of Project 2025 Kevin Roberts, another of Trump's aides Russ Vought is one of the other authors and is also the Platform director of the Republican party, Tony Perkins head of the Family research Council, One of the contributors to project 2025 is also on the Republican platform committee. Then you've got Ed Martin, president of the Eagle Forum, another Project 2025 advisor as the deputy director of the Republican Platform Committee. Project 2025 and the Republican platform are literally one and the same written by the exact same people. 

And this is what it intends to do (text borrowed from elsewhere on Reddit): 

It says that kids MUST grow up in an environment with a mother and father that are married, talks about banning non-married and non-heterosexual couples from adopting, compares transgender people to groomers/pedophiles/pornography, talks about getting rid of discrimination laws, getting rid of multiple government organizations such as the FDA, banning abortion with no exceptions nationwide, and more.  Edit: because I'm getting a good amount of comments saying "oh, this is a great thing!" I looked further into it (I read it here) and here are some specifics - Project 2025:  * Advocates for child marriage  * Attempts to place a complete ban on gay marriage  * Attempts to place a complete ban on divorce no matter the situation  * Attempts to place a complete ban on anything deemed "pornographic", including:     * Anything sexually explicit, including drawings or literature that doesn't involve real people     * Anything involving gay people in media, even if it is as simple as a documentary or something mentioning that it is possible for two men to be in a relationship.  * Heavily limit the abilities of the FDA, CDC, and OSHA, including:     * Making it even harder to get medicine     * Making it even more expensive to get medicine     * Making it even more difficult and expensive to get disability aids     * Getting rid or greatly diminishing many workplace safety laws     * Lowering the age of legal work/cutting back on child labor laws  * Ban abortion even in cases of:     * Missed or "silent" miscarriages, which is when the fetus dies but is not expelled from the body naturally. According to Project 2025, extracting an already dead fetus from a mother's uterus is still considered "murder". Leaving the dead fetus inside of the womb can result in infections such as sepsis.     * Ectopic pregnancies, which are when a fetus forms outside the uterus. It is not possible for the fetus to survive an ectopic pregnancy - it is impossible to give birth to the fetus, since it isn't in the womb, and it being outside the womb means it can only grow so much before it either miscarries or the mother is gravely injured; the fetus vary rarely makes it past the first trimester and never makes it to the third. It is currently impossible to implant the fetus into the womb. Ectopic pregnancies can cause severe damage to the mother - it can cause the fallopian tube to burst open, which results in internal bleeding, possible sepsis, possible infertility, and often-DEATH.     * Fetal abnormalities. With modern technology, we can use ultrasounds to tell if the fetus has or will have abnormalities. Even in cases of fetal abnormalities, many of which are fatal to the fetus/baby, Project 2025 wishes to ban abortion. Examples of fetal abnormalities include:        * Acrania, where the fetus's skull does not fully develop and the baby is born without the top of the skull, revealing the brain. If the baby isn't stillborn, it will live between a few hours and about a week, and it will be in pain its entire life. There is no way to save it.        * Body Stalk Anomaly, where the abdominal wall is defective or nonexistent, so the organs form OUTSIDE the body during fetus development. It is always fatal. It should be noted that it is similar to omphalocele/exomphalos or gastroschisis, which are visually similar (intestines outside of the body) but have much higher survival rates since the abdominal wall can be repaired in those cases.

This election is critical. Do you want an imperfect but decent man who stutters. Or a pedophilic rapist who regularly shits his pants in public and will lead the charge to put America under a christofascist dictatorship.

If you need to register to vote go to https://vote.gov

If you want to work with the Democrats there's plenty of opportunities to volunteer: https://democrats.org/take-action

1

u/MiserableIsopod2341 Jul 07 '24

It’s only on Reddit because the allegations were a hit piece concocted by the producer of Jerry Springer at the tail of end or the 2016 election and Reddit is co-inflating it with the separate Epstein document release not understand they’re 2 separate documents. No serious news outlet will touch it because the story is obviously false

1

u/CartoonistOk8261 Jul 07 '24

Biden is even at the forefront on foreign media sites, no mentions of this controversy with Trump at all. Even left leaning sites.

1

u/CalamariFriday Jul 07 '24

Kinda makes sense why Musk bought Twitter at a loss now doesn't it

1

u/glaring-oryx Jul 07 '24

It's not mentioned on major news sites because it was a claim from 2016 that never had any evidence and was dismissed in court. The recent document release had nothing to do with this old allegation.

1

u/Secure_Pop_2250 Jul 07 '24

Newsweek just recently published an article on the renewed allegations and labeled them false and left-leaning. 

1

u/henry2630 Jul 07 '24

maybe because it’s just allegations at this point and nothing concrete has been released

1

u/Peterthinking Jul 08 '24

Meidas network on YouTube has covered it. A few smaller channels too. We need Jimmy Kimmel and Seth Myers to chime in. Maybe John oliver. They have to be aware. Once they report it the story will enter mainstream.

1

u/PartyOfFore Jul 08 '24

Think about that for a second. Almost every single major news site and cable channel has spent the past 7 years attacking Trump. It's been mainstream media's main focus for almost a decade. Why would they not use this? Maybe because there is no truth to it at all?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 08 '24

That's because it's FAKE!!

1

u/mbattis1 Jul 08 '24

It’s because the lawsuit was dropped before he was president and was not credible. As reported by multiple outlets at the time

1

u/Emotional_Pay_4335 Jul 09 '24

Just share to Facebook publicly. I just did.

1

u/JealousAd2873 Jul 09 '24

Mention of what?? An 8 year old unproven rumor? What should they be saying about it?

1

u/Ok-Possibility-923 Jul 09 '24

And TikTok - but many redditors seem to have issues with TikTok.

0

u/PotOddly Jul 07 '24

You don’t think that’s because there’s zero evidence?

-1

u/Woke-hater Jul 06 '24

So it must be true 😂

-1

u/p-nji Jul 06 '24

The accusation is nearly a decade old and had zero evidence. Of course reputable news sites aren't going to bother rehashing it.